User talk:Suhail.Poise

This is Suhail.Poise's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Your submission at Articles for creation: Bota Pathri, Kashmir (September 29)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted because it included copyrighted content, which is not permitted on Wikipedia.

Wikipedia cannot accept material copied from elsewhere, unless it explicitly and verifiably has been released to the world under a suitably free and compatible copyright license or into the public domain and is written in an acceptable tone—this includes material that you own the copyright to. You should attribute the content of a draft to outside sources, using citations, but copying and pasting or closely paraphrasing sources is not acceptable. The entire draft should be written using your own words and structure.

You are welcome to write an article on the subject, but please do not use copyrighted work.

Draft:Bota Pathri, Kashmir may be deleted at any time unless the copied text is removed. Copyrighted work cannot be allowed to remain on Wikipedia.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page. or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Umakant Bhalerao (talk) 07:34, 29 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Suhail.Poise! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Umakant Bhalerao (talk) 07:34, 29 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Umakant Bhalerao,

Thank you for your message and for taking the time to review my article draft. I appreciate your feedback, and I'm eager to address any concerns that may have led to its decline.

Could you kindly provide me with specific feedback or reasons for the decline so that I can make the necessary improvements to the article? This will help me better understand and rectify any issues that may have caused the initial decline.

I'm committed to contributing valuable content to Wikipedia and am open to making revisions to ensure the article meets Wikipedia's standards and guidelines. Your guidance would be greatly appreciated.

Once I've made the necessary revisions, I would be grateful if you could reconsider the article for approval. Your assistance in this matter would be invaluable, and I'm eager to work together to ensure the article is a valuable addition to Wikipedia.

Thank you for your time and consideration.

Best regards,

Suhail.Poise Suhail.Poise (talk) 07:43, 29 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Deb. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions have been undone because they appeared to be promotional. Advertising and using Wikipedia as a "soapbox" are against Wikipedia policy and not permitted; Wikipedia articles should be written objectively, using independent sources, and from a neutral perspective. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about Wikipedia. Thank you.

You appear to have a close connection to the subject on Wikipedia that raises concerns about a conflict of interest. In keeping with Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy, edits where there is a conflict of interest, or where such a conflict might reasonably be inferred from the tone of the edit and the proximity of the editor to the subject, are strongly discouraged.

Anyone with a conflict of interest must avoid or exercise great caution when:

editing articles related to you, your family or colleagues, your organization or its competitors, as well as projects and products they are involved with,
participating in deletion discussions about articles related to your organization or its competitors,
linking to the Wikipedia article or website of your organization in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam);
and you must always:
avoid breaching relevant policies and guidelines, especially neutral point of view, verifiability, and autobiography.

Note that you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure. Even if you are not being paid, you are expected to disclose any close connection with the subject of the article, using the connected contributor template.

For more details about what constitutes a conflict of interest, please see Wikipedia:Conflict of Interest. Thank you.Deb (talk) 07:45, 29 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Umakant Bhalerao,

Thank you for your message and for taking the time to review my article draft. I appreciate your feedback, and I'm eager to address any concerns that may have led to its decline.

Could you kindly provide me with specific feedback or reasons for the decline so that I can make the necessary improvements to the article? This will help me better understand and rectify any issues that may have caused the initial decline.

I'm committed to contributing valuable content to Wikipedia and am open to making revisions to ensure the article meets Wikipedia's standards and guidelines. Your guidance would be greatly appreciated.

Once I've made the necessary revisions, I would be grateful if you could reconsider the article for approval. Your assistance in this matter would be invaluable, and I'm eager to work together to ensure the article is a valuable addition to Wikipedia.

Thank you for your time and consideration.

Best regards,

Suhail.Poise Suhail.Poise (talk) 07:45, 29 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The person you are addressing is unlikely to see your message as you haven't formatted it in such a way as to alert him to it. However, if you still have questions after reading the relevant guidelines, you can find the answers you need at the Teahouse. Deb (talk) 07:47, 29 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Umakant Bhalerao,

Thank you for your message and for taking the time to review my article draft. I appreciate your feedback, and I'm eager to address any concerns that may have led to its decline.

Could you kindly provide me with specific feedback or reasons for the decline so that I can make the necessary improvements to the article? This will help me better understand and rectify any issues that may have caused the initial decline.

I'm committed to contributing valuable content to Wikipedia and am open to making revisions to ensure the article meets Wikipedia's standards and guidelines. Your guidance would be greatly appreciated.

Once I've made the necessary revisions, I would be grateful if you could reconsider the article for approval. Your assistance in this matter would be invaluable, and I'm eager to work together to ensure the article is a valuable addition to Wikipedia.

Thank you for your time and consideration.

Best regards,

Suhail.Poise Suhail.Poise (talk) 07:46, 29 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]