User talk:Sufi Articles Creator

Welcome!

Hello, Sufi Articles Creator, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as Hazrat Syed Āsghār Àli Shah Bhukari, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may not be retained.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{help me}} on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! TopCipher 17:02, 1 March 2017 (UTC)

March 2017

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, your addition of one or more external links to the page Hazrat Syed Āsghār Àli Shah Bhukari has been reverted.
Your edit here to Hazrat Syed Āsghār Àli Shah Bhukari was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove links which are discouraged per our external links guideline. The external link(s) you added or changed (http://spritualtreatments.blogspot.com/2014/08/history-of-hazrat-shah-aqeeq-shah.html?m=1) is/are on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia. If the external link you inserted or changed was to a blog, forum, free web hosting service, fansite, or similar site (see 'Links to avoid', #11), then please check the information on the external site thoroughly. Note that such sites should probably not be linked to if they contain information that is in violation of the creator's copyright (see Linking to copyrighted works), or they are not written by a recognised, reliable source. Linking to sites that you are involved with is also strongly discouraged (see conflict of interest).
If you were trying to insert an external link that does comply with our policies and guidelines, then please accept my creator's apologies and feel free to undo the bot's revert. However, if the link does not comply with our policies and guidelines, but your edit included other, constructive, changes to the article, feel free to make those changes again without re-adding the link. Please read Wikipedia's external links guideline for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! --XLinkBot (talk) 07:38, 2 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Check my page-

Sir Man of Paradise please check my I create new content for External Links is everything is OK? Now? Sufi Articles Creator (talk to Sufi Saint Servant) 3:04 AM, 2 March 2017 Ontario,Canada (UTC)

Hello

Hello, Sufi Articles Creator. You have new messages at Samee's talk page.
Message added 12:12, 2 March 2017 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.[reply]

sami ^talk 12:12, 2 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you so much sir I am deleting this notification of proposed deletation Wali Articles Creator (Talk to Allah's Servant) 7:31, 2 March 2017 (UTC)

March 2017

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to remove speedy deletion notices from pages you created yourself, as you did at Syed Asghar Ali Shah Bukhari, you may be blocked from editing. bonadea contributions talk 14:27, 2 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Please sir delete Shah Aqeeq Baba Page

This account has been blocked indefinitely as a sock puppet that was created to violate Wikipedia policy. Note that using multiple accounts is allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not, and that all edits made while evading a block or ban may be reverted or deleted. If this account is not a sock puppet, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below. — CactusWriter ^(talk) 16:41, 2 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

FYI, I didn't delete that article. It was deleted because you abused multiple user accounts. sami ^talk 20:09, 2 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Samee CactusWriter If you do indeed see that the editor is abusing multiple accounts, then why did you oblige to their request, and vote to keep Shah Aqeeq Baba?[1] Even more suspicious is the fact that you did not even leave a rationale behind your decision. Being an editor since 2012, it be safe to bet on the assumption you would know better than to leave a vote on AfD with no explanation of the decision behind your vote. I've had my account for less than a year, and I already know that. Boomer Vial^{Holla! We gonna ball!} 21:07, 2 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I did not know that the user was abusing multiple accounts. I did not oblige to their request. I reviewed an article, which they created and I found a similar article Shah Aqeeq Baba in suggestions and I tagged them for merger.¹. Yes, I know that Wikipedia uses consensus and not votes and you may check for my behaviour at previous AfDs. The topic was not a hoax (as well as controversial) for me, that's why I opted 'keep' in accordance with keep rationale by user Kashmiri (though I did not mention that). sami ^talk 12:02, 3 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Samee So wait, which came first the chicken, or the egg? Boomer Vial^{Holla! We gonna ball!} 12:49, 3 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Shah Aqeeq Baba was created on 25 Feb and Syed Asghar Ali Shah Bukhari was created yesterday (as it was among those articles that I were reviewing yesterday). sami ^talk 12:57, 3 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]