User talk:Sufaid

Ahmadi - Table issues

Hi, with ref to the issues raised by you on the Ahmadi talk page - I have tried to re-arrange some of the ambiguous statements - there may still be some mistakes. thanks , best regards Nazli 15:05, 25 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you

Thank you Sufaid, for your appreciation. Best regards Nazli 10:31, 27 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Spencer

Hi Sufaid,

I have found the following article written by Karen Armstrong on Robert Spencer's criticisms of the Qur'an here [1]. I think it would be useful for the criticism of the Qur'an article. Cheers, --Aminz 07:40, 29 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Ok thanks. Will definitely look this up. Sufaid 07:34, 30 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

My Apologies

I'd like to apologize for reverting your recent edits that were in good intention, but unfortunately they destroyed the entire styling of the template, making it unbearably big. Aesthetics is important here too, but yes, not at the price of knowledge.

I recently redid did the Ahmadi template, as you have seen, and most of the individuals concerned with Ahmadi articles in general were invited to the talk page (http://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/Template_talk:Ahmadiyya) in order to discuss their opinions and what we should do in the new template. We've been making progress, however, we have shunned any drastic changes to its current form. Since this template is critical and controversial, I'd like you to post your opinions there before any more big changes.

The changes you made were discussed before, and we agreed not to go about them for aesthetic reasons, and in the meantime decided to figure out a better organizational pattern to relay the information. If you have any ideas regarding that, we'd love to hear them.

I'm very sorry, once again. --Enzuru 23:32, 21 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:34, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]