User talk:Suckmyditka

Your account has been blocked indefinitely because it has become apparent that it is being used only for vandalism. Furthermore, your username is a blatant violation of our username policy, meaning that it is profane; threatens, attacks or impersonates another person; or suggests that your intention is not to contribute to the encyclopedia (see our blocking and username policies for more information).

We invite everyone to contribute constructively to our encyclopedia, but users are not allowed to edit with inappropriate usernames, and trolling or other disruptive behavior is not tolerated. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}} below this notice, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Gogo Dodo (talk) 00:07, 1 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Suckmyditka (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I didn't vandalise. My friend, hermanator1, asked me if I could remove any refrences of his account from that page, because it was his last name and he didn't want it publicly visible. In addition to it, he wanted me to write why they hate him, when he just was contributing. I feel that my IP should be unblocked, but my account can be deleted. I feel violated by this.

Decline reason:

This is not an unblock request. Kinu ^t/_c 00:33, 1 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

I feel violated by this block and should be unblocked because I feel violated (I feel violated.)

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Suckmyditka (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I should be unblocked. I feel violated. I didn't vandalise. I feel violated. My friend, hermanator1, asked me if I could remove any refrences of his account from that page, (I feel violated) because it was his last name and he didn't want it publicly visible. I feel violated. In addition to it, he wanted me to write(I feel violated) why they hate him, when he just was contributing. I feel violated. I feel that my IP should be unblocked, (I feel violated)but my account can be deleted. I feel violated.Suckmyditka (talk) 19:56, 5 December 2011 (UTC) (talk) 19:56, 5 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Unblock request doesn't even remotely address the reason for the block. Further, I'm convinced that "I feel violated" is a disruptive attempt to mock a clearly appropriate block. I've removed talk page access. v/r - T P 20:25, 5 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

You, with a username of "Suckmyditka" feels violated, and yet you come in with guns blazing, blatantly vandalizing that talk page and blatantly attacking others. And you have the audacity to say that you feel violated? What about the rest of the people whom you offended by calling them "sockpuppets"? Oh wait, I can also answer that for you – you don't care one single bit about anybody else.

And I didn't mention the blatant vandalism you did about a week ago here and here, which the latter clearly indicates that Hermanator is you. You are not fooling us, and you are only making yourself look more and more like a complete moron. –MuZemike 20:07, 5 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]