User talk:Subodh Vishwakarma

April 2023

Hello, I'm Arjayay. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Lactational amenorrhea have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. - Arjayay (talk) 10:27, 24 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add inappropriate external links to Wikipedia, as you did to Diabetes. Wikipedia is not a collection of links, nor should it be used for advertising or promotion. Inappropriate links include, but are not limited to, links to personal websites, links to websites with which you are affiliated (whether as a link in article text, or a citation in an article), and links that attract visitors to a website or promote a product. See the external links guideline and spam guideline for further explanations. Because Wikipedia uses the nofollow attribute value, its external links are disregarded by most search engines. If you feel the link should be added to the page, please discuss it on the associated talk page rather than re-adding it. Thank you. - Arjayay (talk) 10:29, 24 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Pace Hospitals (April 26)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Marshelec were:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

in-depth (not just passing mentions about the subject)
reliable
secondary
independent of the subject

Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies.

The comment the reviewer left was:

The brief content seems overly promotional. There is no significant coverage of the history or development of the hospitals, or their ownership, or any key issues or criticisms. The cited sources provide no more than brief coverage of listing of the hospitals, and are not adequate to provide support for the article - ie these sources are not sufficient to meet the notability criteria for the article. Significant expansion of content is needed, plus a good range of independent, reliable sources that each provide more than just passing mention of the hospital(s)...

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Pace Hospitals and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Marshelec (talk) 02:13, 26 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Subodh Vishwakarma! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Marshelec (talk) 02:13, 26 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Pace Hospitals has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Pace Hospitals. Thanks! Marshelec (talk) 09:18, 5 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Pace Hospitals has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Pace Hospitals. Thanks! Eagleash (talk) 12:04, 5 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Eagleash,

Thank you for your kind advice. Subodh Vishwakarma (talk) 12:30, 5 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Logo in PACE Hospitals article

Before re-submitting the PACE Hospitals article at articles for creation, please attend to this issue.

The PACE Hospitals logo file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons is not compliant – it has not been provided with the appropriate licence. For a next time, please note that there is an upload process for non-free logos that is provided in Wikimedia Commons that will help ensure that the correct license is included. To fix this up, please edit the file here: c:en:File:Pace Hospitals.png. The steps required are to edit the file and replace the existing source content by copying and pasting all the following:

==Summary==
{{Non-free use rationale 2
|Description = Logo of PACE Hospitals, Hyderabad for use in [[PACE Hospitals]]
|Source = https://www.pacehospital.com/
|Article = PACE Hospitals
|Purpose = to serve as the primary means of visual identification at the top of the article dedicated to the entity in question.
|Replaceability = n.a.
|Minimality = Sole use in the Info box of the article
|Commercial = n.a.
}}
==Licensing==
{{Non-free logo}}

[[Category:Logos of hospitals in India]]

..Marshelec (talk) 20:17, 8 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Marshelec Thank you for your kind advice. As per your input, I made the changes but got the following error:

{{Information}} template removed

Thank you for your contributions to the Wikimedia Commons.

It has been recognized that you have removed the {{Information}} template, an important template to give basic information about a media file. Unless a more specific template for this type of image exists, such as {{Artwork}} for pieces of artwork or {{Spoken article}} for spoken articles, any file should use this template.

Please note that removing this template doesn't delete the image; if you want to have this image removed from this media repository, please add {{speedydelete|reason for removal goes here}}to the page.
If you think the file should be renamed, please add {{rename|new name|reason for renaming}} to the page.

For other questions, please go to the

help desk

and ask there. If you're sure that the removal of the

template is ok in this case, you may press "Save" again.

In case you were actually making an acceptable contribution, please report this error here. Thank you. Subodh Vishwakarma (talk) 08:39, 9 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

After Save again, got the following error:

This media file may meet the criteria for speedy deletion.

The given reason is: This file is copyrighted and not published under a free license, and the uploader asserts that the usage of this file is fair use, but fair use claims are not permitted on Commons. This file may be deleted without further notice. If the project that this file is to be used on allows fair use, and its usage would comply with the project's appropriate exemptions, please upload it locally. Subodh Vishwakarma (talk) 08:41, 9 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Pace Hospitals (May 9)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by RPSkokie was:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

in-depth (not just brief mentions about the subject or routine announcements)
reliable
secondary
strictly independent of the subject

Make sure you add references that meet all four of these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

WP:HOSPITAL.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Pace Hospitals and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

RPSkokie (talk) 13:32, 9 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@RPSkokie Kindly help in making the article better. Previously, it was thoroughly edited and updated by Marshelec. Need your kind suggestions to make the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article Subodh Vishwakarma (talk) 14:47, 9 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@RPSkokie Kindly check and suggest if further modifications are required. Draft:Pace Hospitals Subodh Vishwakarma (talk) 20:02, 9 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

September 2023

Hello Subodh Vishwakarma. The nature of your edits, such as the one you made to Draft:Pace Hospitals, gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially serious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat search-engine optimization.

Paid advocates are very strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists. If the article does not exist, paid advocates are extremely strongly discouraged from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:Subodh Vishwakarma. The template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=Subodh Vishwakarma|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message. DoubleGrazing (talk) 15:09, 9 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Pace Hospitals (September 9)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by DoubleGrazing were:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

in-depth (not just brief mentions about the subject or routine announcements)
reliable
secondary
strictly independent of the subject

Make sure you add references that meet all four of these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies.

The comment the reviewer left was:

The sources cited do not meet the WP:GNG standard for notability.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Pace Hospitals and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

DoubleGrazing (talk) 15:09, 9 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Pace Hospitals

Hello, Subodh Vishwakarma. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Pace Hospitals, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 17:06, 9 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Pace Hospitals

Hello, Subodh Vishwakarma. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Pace Hospitals".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! CptViraj (talk) 17:02, 9 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,

I was trying to retrieve the page Draft:Pace Hospitals but not happening, need help in restoring it back. Subodh Vishwakarma (talk) 17:18, 17 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]