User talk:Student erotica
Please stop
[edit]When your block has expired, you are welcome to make edits to wikipedia, and discuss things on the talk page. But creating new accounts or changing your ip to continue to edit is a violation of blocking policy, please stop. Thank you! Gscshoyru 16:10, 8 October 2007 (UTC)
Please do not resume edit warring. You've been blocked twice now (by name and IP) for 3RR and sockpuppetry over this issue. / edg ☺ ★ 08:18, 13 October 2007 (UTC)
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Erotica. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions in a content dispute within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. Despite your edit summary here, you can probably remember extensive discussion on several User talk pages including your own, plus in Talk:Erotica. Please stop. / edg ☺ ★ 08:37, 13 October 2007 (UTC)
Here's a link to your previous Talk page, on which you were offered alternatives to editing against consensus in Erotica. Please consider developing a separate article on your topic. As stated before (on your previous Talk page and in Talk:Erotica), student erotica is too small and recent a genre to add to a broad article like Erotica, especially with details of known publications as you wish to add. / edg ☺ ★ 08:43, 13 October 2007 (UTC)
- One of the problems with revert-warring is that other alternatives are often not considered. Have you thought of just putting the information at Student erotica? Mangojuicetalk 17:00, 13 October 2007 (UTC)
October 2007
[edit] You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Erotica. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions in a content dispute within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. Gscshoyru 02:51, 16 October 2007 (UTC)
- This is totally bogus. South Philly 03:32, 16 October 2007 (UTC)
-
- If you revert again, you will violate the WP:3RR again... so please don't. Thanks! Gscshoyru 15:00, 21 October 2007 (UTC)
Canvassing support
[edit]About this and this: please see WP:CANVASS. Thanks! Gscshoyru 05:03, 16 October 2007 (UTC)
Student erotica listed at Redirects for discussion
[edit]![](http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/thumb/2/28/Information.svg/40px-Information.svg.png)
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Student erotica. Since you had some involvement with the Student erotica redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. edg ☺ ☭ 21:05, 1 October 2014 (UTC)