User talk:Strumps1
Welcome!
[edit]Hello, Strumps1, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:
- Introduction to Wikipedia
- The five pillars of Wikipedia
- How to edit a page and How to develop articles
- How to create your first article
- Simplified Manual of Style
Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{help me}}
before the question. Again, welcome! —C.Fred (talk) 00:15, 24 March 2013 (UTC)
March 2013
[edit]Welcome to Wikipedia and thank you for your contributions. I am glad to see that you are discussing a topic. However, as a general rule, talk pages such as Category:East Stirlingshire F.C. players are for discussion related to improving the article, not general discussion about the topic. If you have specific questions about certain topics, consider visiting our reference desk and asking them there instead of on article talk pages. Thank you.
You may be correct that Lawrie McLachlan should have an article. You'll need to do some research to locate reliable sources about him, and then you should create an article about him. You should not insert the text about him to the category page for ESFC players: he is not all players. —C.Fred (talk) 00:26, 24 March 2013 (UTC)
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Category:East Stirlingshire F.C. players, you may be blocked from editing. Regarding your statement "I will continue to re-post Lawrie on the players players page each and every time it is maliciously deleted": first, it's not malicious to remove misplaced text. As I noted above, an article about McLachlan could be created separately, but it shouldn't be in the category text. Second, if you persist in posting the material and refusing to even discuss putting it the right place, that's disruptive editing by definition. —C.Fred (talk) 00:46, 24 March 2013 (UTC)