User talk:Streyie
Streyie, you are invited to the Teahouse!
[edit]
|
Hi Streyie! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. We hope to see you there!
Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts 14:22, 23 March 2018 (UTC) |
undisclosed paid editing
[edit]
Hello Streyie. The nature of your edits gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, such as the edit you made to Cincopa Ltd, and that you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially egregious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to Black hat SEO.
Paid advocates are very strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists, and if it does not, from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.
Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:Streyie. The template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=Streyie|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, please do not edit further until you answer this message.
Speedy deletion nomination of Cincopa Ltd
[edit]Hello Streyie,
I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Cincopa Ltd for deletion, because it seems to be an article that was previously deleted by a consensus decision.
If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.
You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions.
Vexations (talk) 17:57, 7 April 2018 (UTC)
Deletion discussion about Cincopa Ltd
[edit]Hello, Streyie,
I wanted to let you know that there's a discussion about whether Cincopa Ltd should be deleted. Your comments are welcome at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cincopa Ltd .
If you're new to the process, articles for deletion is a group discussion (not a vote!) that usually lasts seven days. If you need it, there is a guide on how to contribute. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.
Thanks,