User talk:Streetsoda
This is Streetsoda's talk page, where you can send him messages and comments. |
|
Archives: 1 |
Hamish MacBeth
At least one external link in Wikipedia no longer works.
Profile photos
[edit]Can I ask why you are changing profile photos for no particular reason and with no discussion, in featured articles such as Kate Winslet? What is the point of introducing an infobox photo that's 6 years older than the one you are replacing??? Elizium23 (talk) 03:37, 26 October 2019 (UTC)
- The profile picture is meant to represent the person of interest, in this case, a celebrity and an OBE recipient in an appealing light. The current run-and-gun photo dwarfs in comparison to the more professionally composed shot from 2011. The previous photo despite being several years older is an accurate depiction of her looks in 2019. I acknowledge, however, that it should have been discussed prior to the edit but I was rather stunned to see such an amateur portrait in a featured article. I have now started a thread on the same in her talk page. Streetsoda (talk) 04:32, 26 October 2019 (UTC)
ArbCom 2019 election voter message
[edit]Disambiguation link notification for November 24
[edit]Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Kottarakkara, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Chengamanadu (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:26, 24 November 2019 (UTC)
Draft:Zhiyun Tech
[edit]Dear sir, I have modified Draft:Zhiyun Tech. Do you think it can become a formal article now? Sincerely look forward to your reply! Thanks.14.134.191.226 (talk) 07:44, 26 November 2019 (UTC)
- Thank you for the addition! It still require key sections including History and Products before being published. Refer to pages on GoPro and DJI for reference. StreetSodatalk 22:27, 26 November 2019 (UTC)
Nomination of Madison Ivy for deletion
[edit]A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Madison Ivy is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Madison Ivy (4th nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. • Gene93k (talk) 18:30, 12 December 2019 (UTC)
Message added 23:15, 12 December 2019 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
Message added 00:36, 13 December 2019 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
Please review BLP and RS
[edit]Please do not add unreferenced or poorly referenced information, especially if controversial, to articles or any other page on Wikipedia about living (or recently deceased) persons, as you did to Madison Ivy. Thank you. --Ronz (talk) 18:33, 12 December 2019 (UTC)
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Lena Paul is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lena Paul until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. gnu57 19:36, 12 December 2019 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for February 6
[edit]An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Durham Live, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Pickering (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 13:03, 6 February 2020 (UTC)
Your Sig is still broken!
[edit]Your sig is missing the </span> at the end. This messes up any material on the page after the sig. Please fix this now, as it is quite disruptive. -Arch dude (talk) 16:44, 6 February 2020 (UTC)
- Thanks for letting me know. It should be fixed now. StreetSodatalk 17:12, 6 February 2020 (UTC)
- No problem. I would not generally "threaten" a user for a simple mistake, but this one had such unexpected consequences that I was desperate to get your immediate attention. I apologize for the "threat". (BTW, I did not actually go the WP:ANI with this). Good luck with your new article! -Arch dude (talk) 01:00, 7 February 2020 (UTC)
- There is still some sort of problem. I think you are missing a </sub> Basically for every XML opening tag (the stuff between a "<" and a ">") you need the matching closing tag. The closing tag is identicel to the opening tag but has a slash after the oepening "<". -Arch dude (talk) 01:06, 7 February 2020 (UTC)
- No worries, it's cool. Yes, I was still missing a </sub>. That is fixed. Wasn't expecting a custom sig to be such a hassle lol – StreetSodatalk 01:24, 7 February 2020 (UTC)
- There is still some sort of problem. I think you are missing a </sub> Basically for every XML opening tag (the stuff between a "<" and a ">") you need the matching closing tag. The closing tag is identicel to the opening tag but has a slash after the oepening "<". -Arch dude (talk) 01:06, 7 February 2020 (UTC)
- No problem. I would not generally "threaten" a user for a simple mistake, but this one had such unexpected consequences that I was desperate to get your immediate attention. I apologize for the "threat". (BTW, I did not actually go the WP:ANI with this). Good luck with your new article! -Arch dude (talk) 01:00, 7 February 2020 (UTC)
- Thanks for letting me know. It should be fixed now. StreetSodatalk 17:12, 6 February 2020 (UTC)
I have sent you a note about a page you started
[edit]Hello, Streetsoda
Thank you for creating National DNA Data Bank of Canada.
User:North8000, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:
Nice work!
To reply, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|North8000}}
. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~
.
(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)
North8000 (talk) 16:37, 12 April 2020 (UTC)
Your draft article, Draft:Zhiyun Tech
[edit]Hello, Streetsoda. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Zhiyun Tech".
In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the {{db-afc}}
, {{db-draft}}
, or {{db-g13}}
code.
If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.
Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! TheImaCow (talk) 14:08, 1 June 2020 (UTC)
The article Daniela Zacherl has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this biography of a living person will be deleted after seven days unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.
If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp/dated}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. Spartaz Humbug! 23:13, 11 June 2020 (UTC)
Nomination of Daniela Zacherl for deletion
[edit]A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Daniela Zacherl is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Daniela Zacherl until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Spartaz Humbug! 21:26, 12 June 2020 (UTC)
Your draft article, Draft:Cindy Kimberly
[edit]Hello, Streetsoda. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Cindy Kimberly".
In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the {{db-afc}}
, {{db-draft}}
, or {{db-g13}}
code.
If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.
Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! —Nnadigoodluck🇳🇬 00:33, 24 September 2020 (UTC)
Your draft article, Draft:Trace Labs
[edit]Hello, Streetsoda. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Trace Labs".
In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.
Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 21:01, 31 October 2020 (UTC)
ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message
[edit]Concern regarding Draft:Cochin Haneefa filmography
[edit]Hello, Streetsoda. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Cochin Haneefa filmography, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.
If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.
If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.
Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 15:17, 7 August 2021 (UTC)
ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message
[edit]ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message
[edit]Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}}
to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:11, 29 November 2022 (UTC)
Subject
[edit]Hello
Are you still on Wikipedia? Would like to consult a subject with you.--Maxaxa (talk) 02:24, 29 January 2023 (UTC)
- Yes! What's up? Streetsoda (talk) 02:55, 29 January 2023 (UTC)