User talk:Strannikk

October 2008

Please stop. Continuing to remove maintenance templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to SQLPro, without resolving the problem that the template refers to may be considered vandalism. Further edits of this type may result in your being blocked from editing. Chris Cunningham (not at work) - talk 16:43, 26 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits.
If you again remove maintenance templates from Wikipedia articles, as you did to SQLPro, without resolving the problem that the template refers to, you will be blocked from editing. Chris Cunningham (not at work) - talk 17:03, 27 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent edits

Hi there. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. If you can't type the tilde character, you should click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your name and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you! --SineBot (talk) 22:12, 27 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

You have been accused of sockpuppetry, which means that someone suspects you of using multiple Wikipedia accounts for prohibited purposes. Please make yourself familiar with the notes for the suspect, then respond to the evidence at Wikipedia:Suspected sock puppets/Strannikk. Thank you. Chris Cunningham (not at work) - talk 22:28, 27 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

clean-up tags

If you keep removing clean-up tags from articles, it is likely that your account will be blocked.

Let's give you a couple of examples:

Tone - We don't use "you" in article - it's a problem = Tag

Primary sources - The article has no citations - it's a problem = tag.

So either do the clean-up, leave the tags or explain on the talk page why you think the tags don't apply. Your current course of act will otherwise lead to a block. --Cameron Scott (talk) 00:48, 31 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of SQLPro

I have nominated SQLPro, an article you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/SQLPro. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. Cameron Scott (talk) 00:56, 31 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for continued removal of maintenance blocks and some bad faith commentary. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make constructive contributions. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}} below, but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first. --VS ^talk 05:28, 31 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]