User talk:Strander3
July 2011[edit]
Welcome and thank you for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your test worked, and it has been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment further, please use the sandbox instead. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. --Bongwarrior (talk) 22:41, 24 July 2011 (UTC)
Welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for reverting your recent experiment. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. If you would like to experiment further, please use the sandbox instead. Thank you. Falcon8765 (TALK) 23:21, 28 July 2011 (UTC)
Your recent edit to the page Apple pie appears to have added incorrect information and has been reverted or removed. All information in this encyclopedia must be verifiable in a reliable, published source. If you believe the information that you added was correct, please cite the references or sources or before making the changes, discuss them on the article's talk page. Please use the sandbox for any tests that you wish to make. Do take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. Thank you. --Darkwind (talk) 23:21, 28 July 2011 (UTC)
October 2011[edit]
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Battle at Kruger, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you. JimVC3 (talk) 23:38, 2 October 2011 (UTC)
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Code of Hammurabi. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been automatically reverted.
- If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
- ClueBot NG produces very few false positives, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been detected as unconstructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
- The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Code of Hammurabi was changed by Strander3 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.965117 on 2011-10-03T16:18:53+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 16:18, 3 October 2011 (UTC)
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Sumer with this edit, you may be blocked from editing. A fluffernutter is a sandwich! (talk) 16:22, 3 October 2011 (UTC)
This is your last warning. The next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at User talk:Strander3, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. A fluffernutter is a sandwich! (talk) 20:10, 3 October 2011 (UTC)
November 2011[edit]
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, but at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Minecraft, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted (undone) by ClueBot NG.
- Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
- ClueBot NG produces very few false positives, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been detected as unconstructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
- The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Minecraft was changed by Strander3 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.951326 on 2011-11-17T02:33:34+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 02:33, 17 November 2011 (UTC)
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. - Barek (talk • contribs) - 00:12, 13 December 2011 (UTC){
Strander3 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
I haven't used Wikipedia for anything but its intended purpose for about a year now. Please unblock my account.
Accept reason:
What's going on below is that we sometimes see users who actually point to their own block evasion as "evidence" that they can work within the rules here, and the wording of your request could be interpreted as someone trying to do that. However, after consulting with the blocking administrator I have decided to go ahead and unblock you. This is being done with the understanding that as you have already been blocked for vandalism ifthere is ever even one single edit from this account that can be considered vandalism the block can and will be re-instated without further warning. Hopefully that won't ever be necessary. Welcome back. Beeblebrox (talk) 18:47, 13 August 2013 (UTC)
- Err, how have you been using it? Editing or just reading? Peridon (talk) 08:10, 9 August 2013 (UTC)
- You have been blocked for 21 months. So where and how have you been editing? And, if unblocked, what do you intend to edit? --Anthony Bradbury"talk" 18:46, 10 August 2013 (UTC)
I have been using it for reading only because I was blocked from editing 21 months ago. I don't have anything in mind that I would like to edit. I just would like the freedom to edit if the desire comes up. I give my word that this account will not be used for vandalism ever again.