User talk:Stourt
A page you started (International Academy for Genealogical and Heraldic Studies) has been reviewed!
[edit]Thanks for creating International Academy for Genealogical and Heraldic Studies, Stourt!
Wikipedia editor Denver20 just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:
Your Page Has been Passed!! Congratulations..
To reply, leave a comment on Denver20's talk page.
Learn more about page curation.
Stourt, you are invited to the Teahouse!
[edit]
|
Hi Stourt! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. We hope to see you there!
Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts 16:20, 25 January 2016 (UTC) |
Proposed deletion of International Academy for Genealogical and Heraldic Studies
[edit]
The article International Academy for Genealogical and Heraldic Studies has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
- This is a bogus organisation. It purports to have high ideals but is using a stolen coat of arms arms. The arms they are using belong to Sir Alasdair Workman MacRobert, 2nd Baronet (1912–1938) - see https://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/MacRobert_baronets . Although the baronetcy is extinct, this organisation has no authority to usurp the arms. The arms contain a Baronet's badge, something no organisation, in the whole of history was ever awarded.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Dialectric (talk) 15:20, 26 January 2016 (UTC)
I have removed the arms as I was not aware that these belong to someone else.
Nomination of International Academy for Genealogical and Heraldic Studies for deletion
[edit]
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article International Academy for Genealogical and Heraldic Studies is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/International Academy for Genealogical and Heraldic Studies until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. — Jkudlick • t • c • s 15:38, 26 January 2016 (UTC)
January 2016
[edit]
Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but your recent edit removed maintenance templates from International Academy for Genealogical and Heraldic Studies. When removing maintenance templates, please be sure to either resolve the problem that the template refers to, or give a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, as your removal of this template has been reverted. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. — Jkudlick • t • c • s 15:48, 26 January 2016 (UTC)
This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of International Academy for Genealogical and Heraldic Studies, and it appears to include material copied directly from http://en.webot.org/?search=International_Academy_for_Genealogical_and_Heraldic_Studies.
It is possible that the bot was mistaken and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. The article will be reviewed to determine if there are any copyright issues.
If substantial content is duplicated and it is not public domain or available under a compatible license, it will be deleted. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material. You may use such publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details. (If you own the copyright to the previously published content and wish to donate it, see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for the procedure.) CorenSearchBot (talk) 16:10, 5 March 2016 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of International Academy for Genealogical and Heraldic Studies
[edit]Hello Stourt,
I wanted to let you know that I just tagged International Academy for Genealogical and Heraldic Studies for deletion, because it seems to be copied from another source.
If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to rewrite it in your own words, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.
You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. —OluwaCurtis »» (talk to me) 16:18, 5 March 2016 (UTC)