User talk:Stormwatch70

Speedy deletion of The Spook's Bestiary

A tag has been placed on The Spook's Bestiary, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article seems to be blatant advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read the guidelines on spam as well as the Wikipedia:Business' FAQ for more information.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. CalendarWatcher (talk) 14:01, 10 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Chipenden

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Chipenden, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. -- The Red Pen of Doom 16:16, 23 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The Spook's Bestiary

Sorry, but I didn't delete the article, as I'm not an administrator: the person who did was Jimfbleak (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA), but one of these admins can also send you a copy. --CalendarWatcher (talk) 07:49, 9 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Kevin Lynch (footballer)

The article Kevin Lynch (footballer) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Player who fails WP:ATHLETE by never having played at a fully-pro level, no sources to suggest general notability.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the Proposed Deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The Speedy Deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and Articles for Deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Struway2 (talk) 13:00, 6 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]