User talk:Stop New World Order
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. I moved your addition to the above referenced article down to the section on critiques, and I tried to remove some of the non-neutral language in the material.
When I deleted your material the first time, I didn't notice that you actually had a footnote reference, so my statement that the material was unsourced was incorrect. For that I apologize. The material was, however, couched in very non-neutral language, so that language has been modified.
When referring to other people's deletions of your material for content reasons, you should not refer to other people's deletions or changes as "vandalism." In this regard, you may want to review:
http://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/Wikipedia:Vandalism
http://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/Wikipedia:Assume_good_faith
Edits based on a good faith disagreement over content (especially over whether material conforms with Wikipedia policies and guideliness such as Verifiability, Neutral Point of View, and No Original Research) are not vandalism.
Again, welcome to Wikipedia, and happy editing! Yours, Famspear 16:16, 27 February 2007 (UTC)
Dear Stop New World Order: Also, here are some links to some of the most important Wikipedia policies:
http://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/Wikipedia:Five_pillars
http://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/Wikipedia:Neutral_point_of_view (official policy)
http://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/Wikipedia:Neutral_point_of_view/FAQ (official policy)
http://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/Wikipedia:Verifiability (official policy)
http://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/Wikipedia:No_original_research (official policy)
Yours, Famspear 16:20, 27 February 2007 (UTC)
- Hi, in this case - Federal Reserve System - annoying fact is not NNPOV. Anyway, I appreciate the concern and time you have used to this case. --Stop New World Order 12:24, 28 February 2007 (UTC)