User talk:StonesCountry

Orphaned non-free image File:Trees-92.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Trees-92.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:43, 4 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

June 2015

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Gavin Rossdale has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
For help, take a look at the introduction.
The following is the log entry regarding this message: Gavin Rossdale was changed by StonesCountry (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.932924 on 2015-06-11T11:15:10+00:00 .

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 11:15, 11 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Reggie and the Full Effect, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. — Jeraphine Gryphon ^(talk) 11:44, 11 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not remove all content from pages without explanation, as you did with this edit to Pirates of the Mississippi. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing. Donner60 (talk) 03:53, 12 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This is your final warning. You may be blocked from editing without further notice the next time you vandalize a page, as you did with this edit to Jack Ingram. Donner60 (talk) 03:56, 12 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because your account is being used only for vandalism. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Gogo Dodo (talk) 04:01, 12 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]