User talk:Stonecoldbeach

February 2015

Please do not add promotional material to Wikipedia, as you did to Sioux City, Iowa. While objective prose about beliefs, products or services is acceptable, Wikipedia is not intended to be a vehicle for soapboxing, advertising or promotion. Thank you. VeryCrocker (talk) 17:20, 14 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to add soapboxing, promotional or advertising material to Wikipedia, as you did at Sioux City, Iowa, you may be blocked from editing. VeryCrocker (talk) 17:25, 14 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent editing history at Sioux City, Iowa shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you get reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. VeryCrocker (talk) 17:27, 14 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Notice of Edit warring noticeboard discussion

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. The thread is Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring#User:Stonecoldbeach reported by User:VeryCrocker (Result: ). Thank you. VeryCrocker (talk) 18:28, 14 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This is your last warning. If you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at Sioux City, Iowa, you may be blocked from editing without further notice.
Your edits have been automatically marked as vandalism and have been automatically reverted. The following is the log entry regarding this vandalism: Sioux City, Iowa was changed by Stonecoldbeach (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.850817 on 2015-02-14T18:41:58+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 18:42, 14 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

February 2015

This account has been blocked indefinitely as a sock puppet that was created to violate Wikipedia policy. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not, and that all edits made while evading a block or ban may be reverted or deleted. If this account is not a sock puppet, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Bbb23 (talk) 21:24, 14 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]