User talk:Stmrlbs/sandbox
hat link
[edit]| This discussion has been closed. Please do not modify it. |
|---|
| The following discussion has been closed. Please do not modify it. |
|
section a[edit]blah blah blah section b[edit]blah blah blah aaabbbcccddd —Preceding unsigned comment added by Stmrlbs (talk • contribs) 02:59, 22 April 2009 (UTC) section c[edit]blah blah blah |
section d
[edit]go.. section b --strmlbs|talk 02:42, 22 April 2009 (UTC)
- bummer. this is why search results pointing to hatted discussions are hard to find.
SPI 01 example
[edit]this is how the font sizes are styled in wikipedia. why.. I don't know, but it seems to be the standard
Awaiting Clerk approval
[edit]Suspected Puppet
[edit]Report date August 17 2009, 01:18 (UTC)
[edit]Evidence submitted by Wikipedia Editor
[edit]SPI 02 example
[edit]does Report date have to be a superior section? why not equal with other sections? can there be more report dates per suspected puppet, or more subcategories on the same level. so far, I have not found any. alternative, with Report date being on even level with rest of SPI report.
Awaiting Clerk approval
[edit]Suspected Puppet
[edit]Report date August 17 2009, 01:18 (UTC)
[edit]Evidence submitted by Wikipedia Editor =
[edit]--stmrlbs|talk 20:35, 26 August 2009 (UTC)