User talk:Stivemeister

Welcome!

Hello, Stivemeister, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

The five pillars of Wikipedia
Tutorial
How to edit a page and How to develop articles
How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
Simplified Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{help me}} before the question. Again, welcome! Apteva (talk) 23:55, 23 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation

Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit once you feel they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Ward Morehouse III.
To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the help desk, via real time chat with helpers, or on the reviewer's talk page

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! Excirial^{(Contact me,Contribs)} 06:47, 11 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation

Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit once you feel they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Ward Morehouse III.
To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the help desk, via real time chat with helpers, or on the reviewer's talk page

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! ~ Matthewrbowker ^{Talk to me} 22:33, 24 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback

Hello, Stivemeister. You have new messages at Matthewrbowker's talk page.
Message added 02:13, 30 June 2012 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.[reply]

~ Matthewrbowker ^{Talk to me} 02:13, 30 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

And again.

~ Matthewrbowker ^{Talk to me} 18:42, 5 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Again. ~ Matthewrbowker ^{Talk to me} 14:55, 8 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

And again. ~ Matthewrbowker ^{Talk to me} 03:34, 13 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Again.

~ Matthewrbowker ^{Talk to me} 21:12, 13 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

And again. ~ Matthewrbowker ^{Talk to me} 19:56, 27 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Ward Morehouse

Thank you for your message on my talk page.

I am puzzled by it, because I have no memory of helping you with this article (though this may be caused by the beer I have been drinking this evening). I do recall reading your posting to the Help Desk. I see it has now been archived, and the thread does not include a contribution from me.

I have now looked at the article Ward Morehouse, and I have some comments.

It is basically clear, unbiassed, and well-written. In my personal opinion, it does not deserve to be deleted. But I have no influence over that decision. I did edit it a bit, making the language slightly less flowery and POV; but there was no serious bias.
It has a section titled "references", but it does not contain what the Wikipedia authorities regard as references. Indeed, the article has no references (in the approved sense) at all, and is, I suspect, likely to be deleted for this reason. An acceptable reference is linked to from the body of the article, and confirms an assertion made in the article. Like this: the earth goes round the sun.^[1] Then at the bottom of the article, you include the word "reflist" in double braces.
It includes the statement "Morehouse ... had two children, a daughter and a son, with Broadway actress Joan Marlowe. Ward Morehouse III also became a drama critic and writer." I think there is a mistake here, the subject of the article and his son can't both be W.M.III.

^ [1]/Universe Today

Maproom (talk) 21:32, 19 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Stivemeister (talk) 00:01, 20 August 2012 (UTC)August 19, 2012[reply]

Thanks for responding so quickly. I appreciate it. Perhaps the confusion stems from another article written about my subject's father, Ward Morehouse (or more accurately -- although the article isn't titled as such -- Ward Morehouse II)? I broach this because my article does have the references linked to from the body of the article for confirmation. It also has the "reflist" in double brackets at the end of my article. Finally, my article does not contain the statement "Morehouse ... had two children, a daughter and a son, with Broadway actress Joan Marlowe. Ward Morehouse III also became a drama critic and writer." That sentence appears in the article about Ward III's father, which was written by someone else. I hasten to add that this person's article is in error because the daughter was sired with the first wife Ruth, and NOT Joan Marlowe. Perhaps the confusion can be straightened out by following this pasted link which should take you to the article I've written and submitted: http://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/Wikipedia_talk:Articles_for_creation/Ward_Morehouse_III

I think that some way,some how, the wrong article has been reviewed and ascribed to me instead of the one I submitted. Would you be willing to follow the link and check this out for me? As I stated in my earlier posting, when I call my article up, it has everything the editors tell me it hasn't. I appreciate your help very much! Stivemeister (talk)Stivemeister

I don't know how to check that.

I recommend that whenever you ask someone to look at an article on Wikipedia, you give a link to it, so that they look at the right article. I have now had a quick look at Ward Morehouse.

Something that is really weird, and annoying, about it, is all the fake blue links, like this. A reader of Wikipedia will expect words and phrases in blue to be links to other WIkipedia articles. Yours aren't, and do nothing when clicked on. I strongly recommend you to remove them before your article gets reviewed.

I also see that your references 1, 2 and 4 somehow don't quite work properly. The "^" characters to the left of the references ought to be links back into the article, to where the citation is; but for those three, they aren't. That also ought to be fixed. Maproom (talk) 17:40, 20 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation

Ward Morehouse III, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you are more than welcome to continue submitting work to Articles for Creation.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Mabeenot (talk) 23:17, 4 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

[1] [1]/Universe Today

[1]