User talk:Stigler
Stigler (talk) 18:24, 9 August 2015 (UTC)
Hello. Before making potentially controversial edits, such as those you made to Yamucha, it is recommended that you discuss them first on the article's talk page. Otherwise, people might consider your edits to be vandalism. Thank you. Lord Sesshomaru (talk • edits) 14:19, 14 May 2008 (UTC)
Speedy deletion of Image talk:Marmot-edit1.jpg
[edit]
A tag has been placed on Image talk:Marmot-edit1.jpg, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to have no meaningful content or history, and the text is unsalvageably incoherent. If the page you created was a test, please use the sandbox for any other experiments you would like to do. Feel free to leave a message on my talk page if you have any questions about this.
If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on [[ Talk:Image talk:Marmot-edit1.jpg|the talk page]] explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. OsamaKReply? on my talk page, please 22:51, 3 September 2008 (UTC)
PETA
[edit]
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
SlimVirgin talk|contribs 08:07, 12 June 2010 (UTC)
Welcome to Wikipedia. Please be aware of Wikipedia's policy that biographical information about living persons must not include unsupported or inaccurate statements. Whenever you add possibly controversial statements about a living person to an article or any other Wikipedia page, as you did to Grant Morrison, you must include proper sources. If you don't know how to cite a source, you may want to read Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners for guidelines. All categories must be supported by mention in the article text with citations. Thank you. Yworo (talk) 04:21, 21 December 2011 (UTC)
Mick Foley
[edit]I've been thinking about this and I believe that removing Foley from [[Category:Fictional characters with multiple personalities]] was the correct decision. The category only includes articles on fictional characters. As Foley is effectively an actor, his biography shouldn't appear there, just as Robert DeNiro and Dawn French (for example) do not appear there despite having portrayed characters with multiple personalities. ŞůṜīΣĻ¹98¹Speak 21:41, 1 February 2012 (UTC)
November 2012
[edit] Hello, I'm Mifter. Wikipedia is written by people who have a wide diversity of opinions, but we try hard to make sure articles have a neutral point of view. Your recent edit to National Organization for Marriage seemed less than neutral to me, so I removed it for now. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks, Mifter (talk) 22:17, 5 November 2012 (UTC)
undertaker
[edit]like Foley, don't add the "Category:Fictional personifications of death", this is an actor, not a Fictional Eliskuya2 (talk) 09:34, 22 November 2014 (UTC)
Trailer Park Boys
[edit]A show only belongs in Category:LGBT-related television programs if LGBT themes and content are central to the show, such that it's impossible to summarize the show's basic premise without making reference to them. To get a show into that category you have to, credibly and without giving the LGBT characters WP:UNDUE weight, get the existence of LGBT content right into the article's introduction or its basic premise summary. It goes on Will and Grace, for example, because the show's basic premise is "gay guy and his female roommate". It goes on Queer as Folk, because that show's basic premise is "the lives of a group of gay and lesbian friends".
It does not go on every show that happens to have an LGBT supporting character or two in it — if the characters were entirely removed from the show and you would not have to do a total rewrite of practically every single word in the entire article as a result, then the show is not "LGBT-related". The category is for shows where LGBT content is central to the show's entire raison d'être in a WP:DEFINING way, not for every single show that happens to acknowledge the fact that LGBT people exist. If Ricky, Julian or Bubbles were LGBT, then the show would probably warrant inclusion the category — but one or two minor supporting characters, who aren't sitting at the core of what the show is about, don't get it in there. Bearcat (talk) 16:03, 9 August 2015 (UTC)
"Minor supporting characters", are you kidding? Randy and Lahey are in every episode and play a MAJOR role in each of them, they are just as central to the show as Ricky, Julian and Bubbles. By your logic, you might as well go ahead and remove Six Feet Under from American LGBT-related television programs because the "basic" premise of that show is not that two of the main characters are gay but that one of them and his brother are funeral directors. Stigler (talk)
- So very central to the show that their "major role in every episode" is only just barely acknowledged anywhere in the article besides the cast list, and what little content about them does exist completely fails to even contain a single appearance of the word "bisexual", or any indication that they're in a romantic relationship rather than just friends, anywhere at all? While I grant that it's possible that you might actually be right about how central they are, the article in its existing form fails to properly demonstrate that — to be allowed into the category, an article has to explicitly clarify why it belongs there, but the article in its present form does not. So if it's really that important to you that it be added to the category, the the article will have to be expanded with content that supports its inclusion. It's not my responsibility to know that a show has bisexual characters in it if the article fails to say that; it's the article's responsibility to contain the content needed to justify its inclusion in an LGBT-related category. Bearcat (talk) 21:48, 10 August 2015 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:28, 23 November 2015 (UTC)
ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!
[edit]
Hello, Stigler. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
ArbCom 2017 election voter message
[edit]Hello, Stigler. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for December 29
[edit]Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of situation comedies with LGBT characters, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Showcase (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:08, 29 December 2017 (UTC)
ArbCom 2018 election voter message
[edit]Hello, Stigler. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message
[edit] | Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add |