User talk:StewSchmidt
Welcome!
|
Reference errors on 21 September
[edit]Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:
- On the Sophie Scholl page, your edit caused a broken reference name (help). (Fix | Ask for help)
Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:16, 22 September 2015 (UTC)
September 2015
[edit]Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Sophie Scholl may have broken the syntax by modifying 4 "{}"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.
- List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
- 1998. Archived from [http://www.jlrweb.com/whiterose/inge.html the original] on 31 December 2007.}} <ref name="weisse-rose-studien.de" />
- 1998. Archived from [http://www.jlrweb.com/whiterose/inge.html the original] on 31 December 2007.}}
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 16:40, 30 September 2015 (UTC)
Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Sophie Scholl may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s and 2 "{}"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.
List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page(Click show ⇨)
|
---|
|
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 17:31, 30 September 2015 (UTC)
Sophie Scholl
[edit]Hello StewSchmidt,
You have made a range of changes to Sophie Scholl, one of our high-importance articles. In doing so you have introduced several errors in the article's citation of sources. The most glaring ones I have tried to fix, but it still does not look good, the page has f.ex. two blocks of sources, both numbered from 1. Please take a look at the top of this page and find the link to 'Citing sources'. Please follow that link to 'Inline citations'. Once you have familiarized yourself with that text, please take a second look at your changes to Sophie Scholl and see if you can express your improvements in a better way. Thanks and happy editing. Lklundin (talk) 07:34, 12 October 2015 (UTC)
Lklundin - The changes I made were to make all of the cites visible. Prior to my edits, if you went to Sophie Scholl's page, you could not see any references. I went into the html text, found the references, and made them visible. Unfortunately, the references already had mistakes in them in regards to numbering before I did anything. I was hoping once I made the references and citation of sources visible, someone else would take the time to find the mistakes made by whoever originally inserted the references and citation of sources. I have repeatedly gone back into the page to try to figure out the mistakes made by whoever originally inserted the references and citation of sources, but I cannot figure out how to correct their mistakes. All I know how to do is to make the references and citation of sources visible. ~ StewSchmidt
ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!
[edit]Hello, StewSchmidt. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
ArbCom 2017 election voter message
[edit]Hello, StewSchmidt. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
Biographies of living people
[edit]Hi. I saw you added a birth date to Adam Driver in this edit. The problem is that biographical details such as these must be properly cited to reliable sources. The IMDb, which you alluded to in your edit, is user-generated and thus unusable on Wikipedia. Many other websites that purport to reveal information about celebrities are similarly considered unreliable. In a biography of a living person, we go with the best available source, not a poor source that has more information. This is to protect the subjects of our biographies from having false information spread about them. If you have questions about a source, you can always raise them at the reliable sources noticeboard. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 07:28, 3 February 2018 (UTC)
ArbCom 2018 election voter message
[edit]Hello, StewSchmidt. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
ArbCom 2019 election voter message
[edit]ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message
[edit]ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message
[edit]ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message
[edit]Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}}
to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:11, 29 November 2022 (UTC)
ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message
[edit]Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}}
to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:35, 28 November 2023 (UTC)