User talk:Stevetakespicks

Important Notice

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in discussions about infoboxes and to edits adding, deleting, collapsing, or removing verifiable information from infoboxes. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

——SN 54129 09:46, 28 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Stevetakespicks, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi Stevetakespicks! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Cullen328 (talk).

Visit the Teahouse

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:08, 29 March 2020 (UTC)

Notification

Do not post on my talk page again. - SchroCat (talk) 08:33, 30 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because your account is being used mainly for trolling, disruption or harassment.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:

{{unblock|reason=I have not vandalized any page or spread false information around. I only asked a question of another user, who apparently has gotten their feelings hurt. An indefinite block is completely out of line. I will stop trying to get through to Schrocat if it means I can edit pages.}}

.

Materialscientist (talk) 09:34, 30 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

My feelings are not hurt: being trolled by an obvious sock is only tedious. Since you started editing under this account you've made no effort to improve anything. There is absolutely no evidence you have any interest in doing anything but annoying others. - SchroCat (talk) 20:28, 30 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Before the account was created I indeed improved many an improperly written article. Mostly grammatical errors and unnecessary information. The only activity that was ever done was towards yourself and therefor the limited evidence that does exist thus far does not point to any direction of what I may do in the future. 'Nuff said. Drew. Stevetakespicks (talk) 21:02, 30 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]