Jump to content

User talk:Stevechoyster

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Apparent sockpuppetry

[edit]

This account has been identified by Checkusers as a likely sockpuppet account related to Stephenthrompson and Louislover1969. Can you explain your relationship to these accounts? bd2412 T 01:12, 11 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Since no explanation has been forthcoming, this account and the apparent related socks are blocked. bd2412 T 18:52, 30 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
@BD2412: Never heard of those accounts and I don't even know what you're talking about. This is a public wi-fi spot. Judge people on whether they are improving the encyclopedia, not whether I use a coffee shop to log in. I don't have Internet at home, Sir. --Stevechoyster (talk) 16:54, 9 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Very well. I have asked the Checkusers for confirmation that the point of origin for your edits is a public wi-fi spot. bd2412 T 02:44, 13 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Block appeal

[edit]
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Stevechoyster (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

I was accused of "sockpuppetry" when I have no idea who those other accounts are. I guess I didn't reply fast enough and the guy got impatient, so he just blocked my account. Why am I judged on where I log in vs. what I'm doing to improve the encyclopedia? Makes no sense to me. I'd enjoy continuing to edit encyclopedia if that request can be accommodated. Thank you.

Decline reason:

You have not been blocked for sharing an IP rather you have been blocked as a result of Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Classyklowngrasper. In any future appeal you need to address, point by point, the evidence in that investigation. Just Chilling (talk) 01:06, 10 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.