User talk:Steve crayon
This account is a suspected sockpuppet of Hiderek1 (talk · contribs · logs) and has been blocked indefinitely. Please refer to the sockpuppet investigation of the sockpuppeteer, and editing habits or contributions of the sockpuppet for evidence. This policy subsection may be helpful. Account information: block log – contribs – logs – abuse log – CentralAuth |
October 2010
[edit]Welcome to Wikipedia! Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent uploads, such as the file you uploaded at Murder, did not appear to be constructive and has been or soon will be deleted. Please read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Bihco (talk) 12:56, 24 October 2010 (UTC)
Please do not add inappropriate images to Wikipedia, as you did to Hudong; it is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Bihco (talk) 12:57, 24 October 2010 (UTC)
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Tasmania, you may be blocked from editing. JRA_WestyQld2 Talk 12:58, 24 October 2010 (UTC)
This is the final warning that you will receive regarding your disruptive edits, such as this edit you made to User:JRA WestyQld2. If you vandalize Wikipedia again, you will be blocked from editing without further notice. Hmrox (talk) 13:00, 24 October 2010 (UTC)
{{unblock|Your reason here}}
, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Tiderolls 13:04, 24 October 2010 (UTC)Steve crayon (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
Decline reason:
I am declining your request for unblock because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that
- the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
- the block is no longer necessary because you
- understand what you have been blocked for,
- will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
- will make useful contributions instead.
Please read our guide to appealing blocks for more information. JohnCD (talk) 13:12, 24 October 2010 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.