Jump to content

User talk:Steve Fox

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Welcome to Wikipedia!!!

[edit]
Hello Steve Fox! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. If you decide that you need help, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. You may also push the signature button located above the edit window. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. This is considered an important guideline in Wikipedia. Even a short summary is better than no summary. Below are some recommended guidelines to facilitate your involvement. Happy Editing! -- LittleOldMe 12:16, 13 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Getting Started
Getting your info out there
Getting more Wikipedia rules
Getting Help
Getting along
Getting technical

Warrington Wolves

[edit]

If I deleted any paragraphs then it was accidental. If you have not already restored the missing text then I will now do so.

An anonymous editor keeps taking all the paragraphs out of history sections. I restore them and then he comes back and removes them again. It is immensely annoying.

Whilst I make every effort to avoid deleting anybody's work, in this case I must have missed your edits. Sorry.GordyB 10:26, 4 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]


Widnes Vikings

[edit]

Hi Steve, thanks for the update :) I take it you must work with the club on the club site? If so, you will be a great resource for me as I currently going to reworks the Vikings page to update the contents and quality of the article.

I plan on getting the article into the top quality Rugby League articles, hopefully with my ideas that I have will be able to set it as a benchmark for the other UK rugby league articles to follow suit. As its currently the Australian articles that are leading the way.

--VikingJohn (talk) 15:44, 15 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]


File source problem with File:Fred Kelsall in 1930.jpg

[edit]

Thanks for uploading File:Fred Kelsall in 1930.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 04:53, 20 December 2009 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Skier Dude (talk) 04:53, 20 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]


[edit]

Thank you for uploading File:Fred Kelsall in 1930.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. Skier Dude (talk) 06:11, 1 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

License tagging for File:Arthur Johnson register.jpg

[edit]

Thanks for uploading File:Arthur Johnson register.jpg. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information; to add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia.

For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 00:06, 21 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

You might want to re-examine the quality of the sources you provided at FA Community Shield. The ESPN one simply states "The game is classed as a non-competitive fixture by the FA", but this is totally unsubstantiated. Since when has the FA considered the Community Shield non-competitive? I think you'd get a few suits at the FA disagreeing with them on that. The Telegraph source is even worse as it just says Ivanovic wasn't going to serve a ban for his red card in the Community Shield; that means nothing in terms of the match's competitiveness, it just means that cards don't carry over to the league season. – PeeJay 18:59, 30 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]