User talk:StephanieLynne

Welcome

Hello, StephanieLynne, and welcome to Wikipedia!

Thank you for your contributions to this free encyclopedia. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below, ask at the help desk, or place {{Help me}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your username and the date. Also, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement. Happy editing! KylieTastic (talk) 20:53, 21 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Getting started
Introduction Contributing to Wikipedia The five pillars of Wikipedia How to edit a page Intuitive guide to Wikipedia
Finding your way around
Table of contents Directories and indexes Department directory
Editing articles
How to develop an article Simplified Manual of Style

Getting help
Frequently asked questions Cheatsheet Our new user help forum, the Teahouse The Help Desk, for more advanced questions Help pages Article Wizard – a Wizard to help you create articles
How you can help
Community Portal Join a WikiProject Follow Wikipedia etiquette Practice civility Discover what's going on in the Wikimedia community

This is StephanieLynne's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Your submission at Articles for creation: Marcia Douglas (May 21)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by KylieTastic was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

The comment the reviewer left was:

No references at all

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Marcia Douglas and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Marcia Douglas, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

KylieTastic (talk) 20:53, 21 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, StephanieLynne! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! KylieTastic (talk) 20:53, 21 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Marcia Douglas (May 21)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Espresso Addict was:

This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability. Wikipedia requires significant coverage (not just mere mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject—see the guidelines on the notability of people, the golden rule and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. Please improve the submission's referencing (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners and Help:Introduction to referencing/1), so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia. If additional reliable sources cannot be found for the subject, then it may not be suitable for Wikipedia at this time.

The comment the reviewer left was:

You need to show that the subject meets the encyclopedia's guidelines for notability, in this case WP:AUTHOR, by providing at least two or three reliable, independent references, such as books, magazines, national newspaper articles, which discuss the subject or her works in detail. Autobiographical material doesn't count towards establishing notability.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Marcia Douglas and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Marcia Douglas, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Espresso Addict (talk) 23:01, 21 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

June 2018

Hello. Your recent edit to Binghamton University appears to have added the name of a non-notable entity to a list that normally includes only notable entries. In general, a person, organization or product added to a list should have a pre-existing article before being added to most lists. If you wish to create such an article, please first confirm that the subject qualifies for a separate, stand-alone article according to Wikipedia's notability guideline. Thank you. ☾Loriendrew☽ ☏(ring-ring) 21:24, 4 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your new account User:Stephanielynnec

Please note that per WP:SOCK#NOTIFY you should state on your user page that you have a new/alternative account, even if you don't plan on using this account anymore. Please also read Wikipedia:Sock puppetry carefully. Misuse of multiple accounts can result in a ban. Bennv3771 (talk) 06:46, 3 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The Marvellous Equations of the Dread

I reviewed your article The Marvellous Equations of the Dread. There are several issues that you should really address before creating more articles:

WP:COI: If you have a conflict of interest with the subject of the article, please disclose it and submit your article creations through the AfC process instead of creating them directly.
WP:Notability: Please ensure that the subject of the article meets Wikipedia's notability criteria, the most basic of which requires multiple independent reliable sources to cover the subject in-depth. To make it easier for reviewers and yourself (as it reduces the chances of your article being rejected or nominated for deletion), please try and cite these secondary reliable sources in your article, instead of relying on WP:Primary sources (including interviews of the author).
WP:Original research and WP:SYNTH: Please do not make original conclusions that are not explicitly supported in the sources you cite.
WP:NPOV: Please use neutral language and avoid WP:PEACOCK
Wikipedia:Manual of Style/Layout, and don't forget to include a "Reference" section, including the Template:Reflist.

Bennv3771 (talk) 06:56, 3 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Marcia Douglas

Hello, StephanieLynne. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Marcia Douglas".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. CoolSkittle (talk) 16:20, 23 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]