User talk:StenhoBJ

StenhoBJ, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi StenhoBJ! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like AmaryllisGardener (talk).

Visit the Teahouse

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:03, 27 September 2016 (UTC)

AfC notification: Draft:CAPE-OPEN Interface Standard has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:CAPE-OPEN Interface Standard. Thanks! Robert McClenon (talk) 23:16, 28 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: CAPE-OPEN Interface Standard (November 5)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by GeoffreyT2000 was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:CAPE-OPEN Interface Standard and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

GeoffreyT2000 (talk, contribs) 20:45, 5 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: CAPE-OPEN Interface Standard has been accepted

CAPE-OPEN Interface Standard, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

GeoffreyT2000 (talk, contribs) 17:22, 6 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: CO-LaN - The CAPE-OPEN Laboratories Network (July 3)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by DrStrauss was:

This submission does not appear to be written in the formal tone expected of an encyclopedia article. Entries should be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources. Please rewrite your submission in a more encyclopedic format. Please make sure to avoid peacock terms that promote the subject.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:CO-LaN - The CAPE-OPEN Laboratories Network and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

DrStrauss talk 08:58, 3 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: CO-LaN - The CAPE-OPEN Laboratories Network (October 25)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by DGG was:

Still not quite ready. The problem is not inline citation as I think the first reviewer commented on his talk page. --they are not needed except for controversial material and BLPs. There are two real problems. The first is indeed the tone as he correctly said--it reads too much like an organizational web page (for example, the second section just has to say that individuals can join as associate members; the details of what rolet hey are permitted to take is not of general interest ) Try to avoid jargon like "Focussed on" and also try to avoid wordiness. Corporate reports tend not to be consie. Encyclopedia articles are different in this respect. The second is the need for sufficient substantial discussion to show notability . The three refs you have for this are good, and considerably more than submitted for most EU projects--almost all of which get deleted. What you need to do is to find additional references to their published work. The n resubmit.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:CO-LaN - The CAPE-OPEN Laboratories Network and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

DGG ( talk ) 04:58, 25 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:CO-LaN - The CAPE-OPEN Laboratories Network concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:CO-LaN - The CAPE-OPEN Laboratories Network, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:32, 26 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:CO-LaN - The CAPE-OPEN Laboratories Network

Hello, StenhoBJ. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "CO-LaN - The CAPE-OPEN Laboratories Network".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. HasteurBot (talk) 06:01, 25 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:CO-LaN - The CAPE-OPEN Laboratories Network

Hello, StenhoBJ. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "CO-LaN - The CAPE-OPEN Laboratories Network".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. JMHamo (talk) 19:20, 9 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]