Jump to content

User talk:Stellamwangi

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Welcome to Wikipedia: check out the Teahouse!

[edit]
Teahouse logo
Hello! Stellamwangi, you are invited to the Teahouse, a forum on Wikipedia for new editors to ask questions about editing Wikipedia, and get support from peers and experienced editors. Please join us!
I, and the rest of the hosts, would be more than happy to answer any questions you have! SarahStierch (talk) 05:30, 26 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation

[edit]
Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit once you feel they have been resolved.

Your submission at Articles for creation

[edit]
Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit once you feel they have been resolved.

Cupid Media Article

[edit]

Hello Stellamwangi,

Thanks for getting in touch with me at my talk page. There are a number of help/policy pages that apply to the problems that presently exist with your article - I will supply the links here. First, you need to find sources that are independent of your subject and reliable in order to establish notability of this website. In other words, encyclopedia articles are meant to be about subjects that other, independent, third party sources have found to be notable. If other sources, preferably newspapers, magazines, online news sources - have not written about, reviewed, or discussed your topic then it is not notable enough for a wikipedia article. Secondly, because Wikipedia is not a web hosting site, advertising is strictly prohibited: please review What Wikipedia is Not. Promotional articles and advertising will not be accepted. Finally, you may want to look at Wikipedia's policy regarding external links - external links should not be included in the body of the article and when included at the end of the article and a long list of external links must be justified. The important points to remember are:

  1. External links should not normally be used in the body of an article. Exceptions are rare.
  2. Links in the "External links" section should be kept to a minimum. A lack of external links or a small number of external links is not a reason to add external links.
  3. In the "External links" section, try to avoid separate links to multiple pages in the same website; instead, try to find an appropriate linking page within the site.

I hope this is helpful to you. Best Regards, Snowysusan (talk) 08:52, 7 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation

[edit]
Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit once you feel they have been resolved.
Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! Stellamwangi (talk) 11:31, 9 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Articles for creation/Cupid Media

Hello. I have made the recommended corrections on the above named article that you reviewed. Kindly let me know if I made it better.

Stellamwangi (talk) 11:31, 9 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Cupid Media

[edit]
Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit once you feel they have been resolved.

I have made suggested changes.

Stellamwangi (talk) 07:58, 11 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation

[edit]
Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit if you feel they have been resolved.

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Cupid Media, a page you created, has not been edited in 6 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 02:04, 23 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]