User talk:StellaAquila
StellaAquila, you are invited to the Teahouse!
[edit]
|
Hi StellaAquila! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. We hope to see you there!
Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts 16:02, 3 July 2021 (UTC) |
Welcome!
[edit]Hi StellaAquila! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.
As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:
Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.
If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:
If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:
Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date.
Happy editing! Longhair\talk 08:10, 9 July 2021 (UTC)
Nomination of Anacortes Middle School for deletion
[edit]
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Anacortes Middle School until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.
GermanKity (talk) 10:16, 9 July 2021 (UTC)
Australian articles
[edit]
Please refrain from making test edits in Wikipedia pages, even if you intend to fix them later. Your edits have been reverted. If you would like to experiment again, please use your sandbox. Thank you.
The removal of the word Brisbane from articles will not be tolerated. In addition, inserting sources that do not confirm the text in the article will not be tolerated. Many of your edits break the Wikipedia:No original research, Wikipedia:Neutral point of view and/or Wikipedia:Verifiability. Many of your actions are destructive. If you continue to do so, your account will be reported to blocking or topic ban (of Australia topic). TravelerFromEuropeanUnion (talk) 13:57, 13 July 2024 (UTC)
- I have done none of the things you accuse me of, and I have not conducted any so-called “original research”. All the references I employ are from official sources, and are only used to support information in the articles. If you wish to specify the location of local government areas as being within the Greater Brisbane area, then I suggest that your edits comply with the proper grammatical conventions of Australian English. Otherwise, your account may be the one to be reported. StellaAquila (talk) 14:26, 13 July 2024 (UTC)
- " I suggest that your edits comply with the proper grammatical conventions of Australian English. Otherwise, your account may be the one to be reported" - not using Australian grammar on Wikipedia does not break any Wikipedia rules. This is just a recommendation. If you report it, there will be no consequences for me.
- However, your falsification of sources in relation to content is seriously damaging Wikipedia, and the consequences will be severe. Also, the removal of the word "Brisbane" from articles [1] will not be tolerated. Naming Brisbane as a region - your original research [2] also will not be tolerated. This is the last warning. TravelerFromEuropeanUnion (talk) 01:42, 15 July 2024 (UTC)
Yatala Drive-in
[edit]One thing to love about Queensland is how we draw the suburb boundaries so that things that you might think are in one suburb turn out to be in another. It happens all the time. If you want to see the current and accurate boundaries for suburbs, the Queensland Government's Qld Globe is the authority on boundaries, although Google Maps is pretty good too (if you just search it for the suburb name, it will draw the boundaries for you), but if the two disagree, the Qld Globe is authoritative. What I usually do in situations like this is add a mention of the "thing" in the article-you-might-have-expected saying something like "Despite its name, Thing is actually in SomeWhereElse." This helps other contributors from making the same mistake. Off to do that now with the Yatala Drive-In. Kerry (talk) 06:46, 13 August 2024 (UTC)
- Ah, apologies. I forgot that the drive-in is technically in Stapylton. StellaAquila (talk) 06:52, 13 August 2024 (UTC)
Wikipedia research project, University of Technology, Sydney
[edit]Hi! I'm a researcher on the "Wikipedia: our nation's story" research project. We're currently interviewing Wikipedia contributors who work on Australian place articles, specifically Katoomba, Tasmania and the Australia article itself. I can see that you edited the Tasmania article and have edited many place articles beside this one. Would you be interested in doing an interview about your experience? You can contact me here or email me through my user page. Thanks! Francesca FSidotiUTS (talk) 21:33, 29 August 2024 (UTC)
ANI regarding TravellerFromEuropeanUnion
[edit]
There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you.Dfadden (talk) 10:04, 3 September 2024 (UTC)
e.g.
[edit]I notice you have replaced some "e.g." with "for example" and thought you might like to know that "e.g." is actually the preferred form according to the Wikipedia Manual of Style (which is fairly large and covers a wide range of stuff), so just look specifically at this section that deals with common abbreviations. Sooner or later someone who likes to copyedit will replace your "for example" back to "e.g." so I thought I should mention it so you don't waste more time doing it.
I don't know if you are interested, but there is a monthly Zoom session organised by Wikimedia Australia on Wed afternoon called "Drop In and Wiki" which is a informal chat to meet other Australian Wikipedians, talk about what you are working on, ask questions, etc. No need to register, just use the Zoom link at the URL above. If that time slot doesn't suit, you can organise a one-on-one session to chat with someone at a time that suits you better. Just ask at contact@wikimedia.org.au Kerry (talk) 08:28, 16 September 2024 (UTC)
Null Island
[edit]Hi. While I'm sure the coordinates were added entirely in error, in this edit you overrode the related wikidata value. And placed Moneypoint power station on Null Island. Rather than in County Clare. FYI. Guliolopez (talk) 11:43, 30 September 2024 (UTC)
October 2024
[edit]
Hello. I wanted to let you know that your recent edit(s) to the The Quiet Earth (film) plot summary have been removed because they added a significant amount of unnecessary detail. Please avoid excessive detail and high word counts when editing plot summaries/synopses. You may read the plot summary edit guides to learn more about contributing constructively to plot summaries/synopses. There are also specific guidelines for films, musicals, television episodes, anime/manga, novels and non-fiction books. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. DonIago (talk) 18:44, 3 October 2024 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for October 17
[edit]Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Seascape (Auckland), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page China State Construction. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, --DPL bot (talk) 07:55, 17 October 2024 (UTC)
ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message
[edit]
Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:45, 19 November 2024 (UTC)
Introduction to contentious topics
[edit]
You have recently edited a page related to the Arab–Israeli conflict, a topic designated as contentious. This is a brief introduction to contentious topics and does not imply that there are any issues with your editing.
A special set of rules applies to certain topic areas, which are referred to as contentious topics. These are specially designated topics that tend to attract more persistent disruptive editing than the rest of the project and have been designated as contentious topics by the Arbitration Committee. When editing a contentious topic, Wikipedia’s norms and policies are more strictly enforced, and Wikipedia administrators have an expanded level of powers and discretion in order to reduce disruption to the project.
Within contentious topics, editors should edit carefully and constructively, refrain from disrupting the encyclopedia, and:
- adhere to the purposes of Wikipedia;
- comply with all applicable policies and guidelines;
- follow editorial and behavioural best practices;
- comply with any page restrictions in force within the area of conflict; and
- refrain from gaming the system.
Additionally, you must be logged-in, have 500 edits and an account age of 30 days, and are not allowed to make more than 1 revert within 24 hours on a page within this topic.
Editors are advised to err on the side of caution if unsure whether making a particular edit is consistent with these expectations. If you have any questions about contentious topics procedures, you may ask them at the arbitration clerks' noticeboard or you may learn more about this contentious topic here. You may also choose to note which contentious topics you know about by using the {{Ctopics/aware}} template. As a note, per these community-authorized general sanctions, there is a one-revert rule in place for all articles related to the Syrian Civil War and the Islamic State of Iraq and the Levant, broadly construed. This means that an editor in this area may make no more than one revert per article per 24 hour period, unless an obvious exception applies. Please let me know if you have any questions about this