User talk:Steely 340

June 2007

Please do not post copyrighted material to Wikipedia without permission from the copyright holder, as you did to Digital-Evolutions. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites ({{{url}}} in this case) or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.
If you believe that the article is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under the GNU Free Documentation License (GFDL) then you should do one of the following:

If you have permission from the author leave a message explaining the details on the article Talk page and send an email with the message to "permissions-en (at) wikimedia (dot) org". See Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for instructions.
If a note on the original website states that re-use is permitted under the GFDL or released into the public domain leave a note at Talk:Digital-Evolutions with a link to where we can find that note;
If you own the copyright to the material: send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en(at)wikimedia(dot)org or a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation permitting re-use under the GFDL, and note that you have done so on the article Talk page. Alternatively, you may create a note on your web page releasing the work under the GFDL and then leave a note at Talk:Digital-Evolutions with a link to the details.

Otherwise, you are encouraged to rewrite this article in your own words to avoid any copyright infringement. After you do so, you should place a {{hangon}} tag on the article page and leave a note at Talk:Digital-Evolutions saying you have done so. An administrator will review the new content before taking action.

It is also important that all Wikipedia articles have an encyclopedic tone and follow Wikipedia article layout. For more information on Wikipedia's policies, see Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Andrew_pmk | Talk 03:46, 11 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not post copyrighted material to Wikipedia without permission from the copyright holder, as you did to Digital-Evolutions. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites ({{{url}}} in this case) or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.
If you believe that the article is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under the GNU Free Documentation License (GFDL) then you should do one of the following:

If you have permission from the author leave a message explaining the details on the article Talk page and send an email with the message to "permissions-en (at) wikimedia (dot) org". See Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for instructions.
If a note on the original website states that re-use is permitted under the GFDL or released into the public domain leave a note at Talk:Digital-Evolutions with a link to where we can find that note;
If you own the copyright to the material: send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en(at)wikimedia(dot)org or a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation permitting re-use under the GFDL, and note that you have done so on the article Talk page. Alternatively, you may create a note on your web page releasing the work under the GFDL and then leave a note at Talk:Digital-Evolutions with a link to the details.

Otherwise, you are encouraged to rewrite this article in your own words to avoid any copyright infringement. After you do so, you should place a {{hangon}} tag on the article page and leave a note at Talk:Digital-Evolutions saying you have done so. An administrator will review the new content before taking action.

It is also important that all Wikipedia articles have an encyclopedic tone and follow Wikipedia article layout. For more information on Wikipedia's policies, see Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Andrew_pmk | Talk 03:49, 11 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Digital-Evolutions

A tag has been placed on Digital-Evolutions, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article seems to be blatant advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read the general criteria for speedy deletion, particularly item 11, as well as the guidelines on spam.

If you can indicate why the subject of this article is not blatant advertising, you may contest the tagging. To do this, please add {{hangon}} on the top of the page and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would help make it encyclopedic, as well as adding any citations from reliable sources to ensure that the article will be verifiable. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. ^{SkyIsFalling 19:55, 12 June 2007 (UTC)} 19:55, 12 June 2007 (UTC) or ==Digital-Evolutions== A tag has been placed on Digital-Evolutions, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article seems to be blatant advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read the general criteria for speedy deletion, particularly item 11, as well as the guidelines on spam.[reply]

If you can indicate why the subject of this article is not blatant advertising, you may contest the tagging. To do this, please add {{hangon}} on the top of the page and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would help make it encyclopedic, as well as adding any citations from reliable sources to ensure that the article will be verifiable. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this.

Please do not remove speedy deletion tags from a page you have created. ^{SkyIsFalling 19:55, 12 June 2007 (UTC)}[reply]
I have replied to the messages you left on my talk page. ^{SkyIsFalling 22:22, 12 June 2007 (UTC)}[reply]

Spam in Get Rendered!

Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Get Rendered!, by Rackabello, another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Get Rendered! is blatant advertising for a company, product, group, service or person that would require a substantial rewrite in order to become an encyclopedia article.

To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Get Rendered!, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Please note, this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion, it did not nominate Get Rendered! itself. Feel free to leave a message on the bot operator's talk page if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot. --Android Mouse Bot 2 15:18, 13 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:Deletion review/Log/2007 June 13

Hi, you listed Smoky Hill High School for deletion review but the page wasn't deleted. Were you trying to nominate to AfD? I am speedy closing the discussion there, because it is to review pages that were deleted and ask for their reinsertion. -- lucasbfr ^talk 19:24, 13 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I saw your comment, let me dig up a bit more to get a full understanding of the situation (and get some work done in the real world) and I'll get back to you :). My closure comments still apply, though. -- lucasbfr ^talk 19:34, 13 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

2 points:

Admins and non-admins are bound to the same standards, we all are editors here and it is often said that adminship is not a big deal. I am fairly sure that User:SkyIsFalling is not an admin though.
About your case, my two cents are (and I am only talking as a fellow editor) that the deletion of Digital-Evolutions and Get Rendered! are Ok. A quick glance made me feel that they do not meet WP:Notability. Now, about the section, I think that if it is a real club of the school, it can be added to the article. You were right talking with him on his talk page, the other steps you could have done are reverting his changes and stating on the talk page that you disagreed and why you felt it was worthy of inclusion. 99% of all disputes end there, we are reasonable people ;). If that fails, you can use the steps of the dispute resolution process, especially Wikipedia:Third Opinion which is quite good for small content disputes. Now, I am going to add back your section with some cleanup (the hyperlink in the title was a bad idea). If you need further help, please don't hesitate to post on my talk page or to put {{helpme}} followed by your question on this page. -- lucasbfr ^talk 19:52, 13 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]