User talk:StavinChain
Perhaps one can go ahead and merge the "Dreamweavers"/"Dream Weavers" page. Doesn't seem to have raised much discussion. You noted errors on the "Dreamweavers" page, but the biggest was describing them as a septet. As far as I know, there were never 7 at one time, but the names given showed everyone who ever sang in the group. -- BRG 21:20, 15 August 2007 (UTC)
- I noticed you haven't been around for a while. I went ahead and merged them; if you ever come back and see this, you can make your corrections. -- BRG 13:30, 16 August 2007 (UTC)
Churches of Christ
[edit]Thanks for your interest in the Churches of Christ Article. Your input and expertise would be greatly appreciated.
I really do not have any business trying to produce content for the page. I am a 5th generation in the Christian Church (Disciples of Christ), Though may Grandad and a great Uncle were part of what became the Independent Christian Churches. I got involved in the Churches of Christ page in self-defence. The edit war in the CoC article seemed to find expression in the article on The Christian Church (Disciples of Christ) that I was trying to edit.
Since the separation of 1906 was over 100 years ago, my study of Disciples history does not cover the last century within the Churches of Christ. I knew however that those outide the Stone-Campbell movement did not understand the concerns of the editors of the CoC page. The section you responded in began with an angry confontation of an editor who was less respectful than I would have hoped who took the CoC article off his watch list rather than talk to me on the talk page.
At the time the CoC article was on partial protection from anonymous and new editors. When the protection expired, the war did not resume. The Article seems to be stable, at least for now. It would be interesting to test that by doing a bit of content editing and waiting a week or so to see how it is received.
A recurring challenge appears to come from editors in the article who seem to never have been required to write a term paper that required references and footnotes. When challenged by a wikipedian to cite reliable third party sources, they have no real clue as to what they are being asked to do. I cannot help them. My sources are almost exclusively CC(DOC), especially after 1906.
If you are willing to help, what would your goal be? What are your ideas to improve the article? How can I help you without interfering in the process of rewriting and citing sources? I would be glad to confer on areas of rewrite and the controversies that I have encountered or observed.
Please reply here so we keep this conversation in one place.John Park (talk) 03:17, 23 July 2008 (UTC)
WikiProject Cleanup
[edit] You are invited to join WikiProject Cleanup, a WikiProject and resource for Wikipedia cleanup listings, information and discussion. |
|---|
- Thanks for joining! Northamerica1000(talk) 01:12, 2 March 2012 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for January 11
[edit]Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Revelation: Revolution '69, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Alan Gordon and John Stewart (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:46, 11 January 2013 (UTC)
Notification of automated file description generation
[edit]Your upload of File:C'estMoi--StavinChain.jpg or contribution to its description is noted, and thanks (even if belatedly) for your contribution. In order to help make better use of the media, an attempt has been made by an automated process to identify and add certain information to the media's description page.
This notification is placed on your talk page because a bot has identified you either as the uploader of the file, or as a contributor to its metadata. It would be appreciated if you could carefully review the information the bot added. To opt out of these notifications, please follow the instructions here. Thanks! Message delivered by Theo's Little Bot (opt-out) 14:47, 7 March 2014 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:09, 23 November 2015 (UTC)
ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!
[edit]
Hello, StavinChain. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
ArbCom 2018 election voter message
[edit]Hello, StavinChain. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)