Jump to content

User talk:Starwars404

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Welcome!

[edit]

Hello, Starwars404, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions.

If you are possessed with Star Wars fandom, you may want to check out Wookieepedia, the Star Wars encyclopedia.

Again, welcome! Gman124 talk 17:28, 8 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Jared Wignall

[edit]

A tag has been placed on Jared Wignall requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. Paragon12321 (talk) 01:20, 10 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Stu Macher

[edit]

A tag has been placed on Stu Macher, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to have no meaningful content or history, and the text is unsalvageably incoherent. If the page you created was a test, please use the sandbox for any other experiments you would like to do. Feel free to leave a message on my talk page if you have any questions about this.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. Woland (talk) 20:58, 2 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Editing problems

[edit]

Hi Starwars404,

Having reviewed your edits to Wikipedia, I'm afraid I've noticed several serious issues with your editing, including spelling errors, unsourced and speculative information, creation of spurious (non-notable) pages and other problems. I would advise that you seek guidance on talk pages from more experienced editors before making any further edits. I would also advise that you do not create any more pages. If you continue to edit without adding value to the encyclopedia, while at the same time creating a lot of work for other editors to fix, remove and cleanup your edits, your ability to edit Wikipedia may be restricted. Thanks, Deiz talk 08:10, 6 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits.
The next time you create an inappropriate page, such as Derek Mears, you will be blocked from editing. NawlinWiki (talk) 19:23, 10 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits.
The next time you disrupt Wikipedia, as you did to Star Wars, you will be blocked from editing. PrimeHunter (talk) 00:33, 12 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

November 2008

[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for reverting your recent experiment with the page Heath Ledger. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. If you would like to experiment further, please use the sandbox or show preview button. Thank you. --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 21:35, 23 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

February 2009

[edit]

Please refrain from making test edits in Wikipedia pages, such as those you made to Batman, even if your ultimate intention is to fix them. Such edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment again, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Lord Sesshomaru (talkedits) 22:58, 3 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Other Notes

[edit]
This blocked user's request to have autoblock on their IP address lifted has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request.
Starwars404 (block logactive blocksglobal blocksautoblockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))
206.53.147.170 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log)

Block message:

Autoblocked because your IP address was recently used by "Starwars4004". The reason given for Starwars4004's block is: "Abusing multiple accounts: Please see: Amorymeltzer

  • Blocking administrator: not provided.

Decline reason: Thank you for reporting this addition account; I will fix the autoblock by blocking this account directly. — FisherQueen (talk · contribs) 17:25, 19 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]


Your request to be unblocked has been granted for the following reason(s):

Block of 206.53.157.62 lifted or expired.

Request handled by: Starwars404 (talk)

Unblocking administrator: Please check for active autoblocks on this user after accepting the unblock request.

This blocked user's request to have autoblock on their IP address lifted has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request.
Starwars404 (block logactive blocksglobal blocksautoblockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))
206.53.157.62 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log)

Block message:

Block evasion: User:Spaceghostguy


Decline reason: reason — Starwars404 (talk) 21:15, 19 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This blocked user's request to have autoblock on their IP address lifted has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request.
Starwars404 (block logactive blocksglobal blocksautoblockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))
206.53.157.62 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log)

Block message:

Block evasion: User:Spaceghostguy


Decline reason: You have been blocked directly as stated in your block log. Since you have not provided a reason for being unblocked, your request has been declined. You may provide a reason for being unblocked by adding {{unblock | your reason here}} to the bottom of your talk page, but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first. Starwars404 (talk) 21:15, 19 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

decline=


This blocked user's request to have autoblock on their IP address lifted has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request.
Starwars404 (block logactive blocksglobal blocksautoblockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))
206.53.147.170 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log)

Block message:

Autoblocked because your IP address was recently used by "Starwars4004". The reason given for Starwars4004's block is: "Abusing multiple accounts: Please see: Amorymeltzer

  • Blocking administrator: not provided.

Decline reason: Thank you for reporting this addition account; I will fix the autoblock by blocking this account directly. — FisherQueen (talk · contribs) 7:02, 25 March, 2010 (UTC)