User talk:Starnestommy/Archive 1
 | This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
| Archive 1 |
Japanese invasions of Korea
Could you explain your revert? (Wikimachine 02:08, 31 March 2007 (UTC))
- Your edit was not encyclopedic in format. --Starnestommy (Talk • Contribs • Uncyc) 02:09, 31 March 2007 (UTC)
About edit summary
I'm not sure you want to know this, but this means "Starnestommy Your mother has sex with a pig". This is a certain way to win a content dispute on Wikipedia. GracenotesT § 02:59, 31 March 2007 (UTC)
Book collecting
I recently spent a few hours editing the book collecting article and you reverted my work using the PNG crusade bot. I'd like to know why you decided to revert my contributions. The article was in terrible need of editing, & most of my edits were simply wikifying and removing POV issues. I'll discuss this in WikiProject Books, because I feel my contributions significantly helped the article have a more NPOV stance than what you have reverted to. --'oac' (old american century) | Talk 04:21, 31 March 2007 (UTC)
- Sorry. Overzealous vandalism reverts; that shade of red in RC tends to make me revert things. --Starnestommy (Talk • Contribs • Uncyc) 04:27, 31 March 2007 (UTC)
Why did you revert my reversion of the IP address's edits? He was removing sections of the article. Macintosh User 19:24, 31 March 2007 (UTC)
- Oops. I revert things too quickly. I'll try not to do that in the future. --Starnestommy (Talk • Contribs • Uncyc) 19:25, 31 March 2007 (UTC)
- OK, no problem. Macintosh User 19:27, 31 March 2007 (UTC)
- Oops. I revert things too quickly. I'll try not to do that in the future. --Starnestommy (Talk • Contribs • Uncyc) 19:25, 31 March 2007 (UTC)
Thank you for making a report about 24.64.121.30 (talk · contribs · block log) on Wikipedia:Administrator intervention against vandalism. Reporting and removing vandalism is vital to the functioning of Wikipedia and all users are encouraged to revert, warn, and report vandalism. However, administrators are generally only able to block users if they have received a recent final warning (one that mentions that the user may be blocked) and they have recently vandalized after that warning was given. The reported user has not yet been blocked because it appears this has not occurred yet. If this user continues to vandalize even after their final warning, please report them to the AIV noticeboard again. Thank you! ViridaeTalk 00:16, 3 April 2007 (UTC)
Vandal reverts
Please be more careful when reverting edits by other users as vandalism as you did here: [1]. I had just closed the AfD for that article as keep, hence my removing the template. WjBscribe 00:30, 3 April 2007 (UTC)
- Oops... I guess I'm reverting too fast. --Starnestommy(Talk • Contribs • Uncyc) 00:31, 3 April 2007 (UTC)