User talk:Starmagicxxx

June 2011

Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but your recent edit removed content from Pyramid. When removing content, please specify a reason in the edit summary and discuss edits that are likely to be controversial on the article's talk page. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the content has been restored, as you can see from the page history. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Dicklyon (talk) 06:42, 18 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

September 2011

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates or other materials from Wikipedia, as you did at Great Zimbabwe, you may be blocked from editing. You removed sourced text, which you should never do unless you can show that the source is being misrepresented Dougweller (talk) 06:02, 12 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Great Zimbabwe - citation required

StarMagicxxx ... Have you actually read the discussion in the Great Zimbabwe Talk-File ? ... I do not want to get into an edit-war with you, but the piece which you have just inserted twice on the GZim main page (which includes one after my recent reversion) does need justification, e.g. through a specific citation... As I said in the GZim Talk-File on 11th August, I doubt whether it ever represented a widely held view. Regards, (E-mail: DLMcN@yahoo.com) --DLMcN (talk) 17:03, 22 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

June 2012 - Great Zimbabwe

StarMagic, please explain your reasons for continually changing the Lemba sub-heading in the "Great Zimbabwe" article. The best place to do that, is on its Talk-Page. Thanks in anticipation, Regards, --DLMcN (talk) 10:21, 9 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Using more than one account?

Please see WP:AN3#User:Fastfromlight reported by Dougweller (Result: 48h). A single editor must not use two accounts on the same article, per WP:SOCK. Thank you, EdJohnston (talk) 15:45, 9 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked for sockpuppetry

This account has been blocked from editing for a period of 2 weeks for sock puppetry per evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Starmagicxxx. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not. Once the block has expired, you're welcome to make useful contributions. If you believe that this block was in error, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. -- DQ (ʞlɐʇ) 08:44, 10 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]