User talk:Starheroine

Welcome!

Hello, Starheroine!

Welcome to Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.

Getting Started

Tutorial
Learn everything you need to know to get started.

Introduction to contributing

The Teahouse
Ask questions and get help from experienced editors.

The Task Center
Learn what Wikipedians do and discover how to help.

Tips

Don't be afraid to edit! Just find something that can be improved and make it better. Other editors will help fix any mistakes you make.
It's normal to feel a little overwhelmed, but don't worry if you don't understand everything at first—it's fine to edit using common sense.
If an edit you make is reverted, you can discuss the issue at the article's talk page. Be civil, and don't restore the edit unless there is consensus.
Always use edit summaries to explain your changes.
When adding new content to an article, always include a citation to a reliable source.
If you wish to edit about a subject with which you are affiliated, read our conflict of interest guide and disclose your connection.
Have fun! Your presence in the Wikipedia community is welcome.

Happy editing! Cheers, Tacyarg (talk) 14:39, 31 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please read MOS:OVERLINK

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia! I appreciate you trying to improve the article Mitchell Hamline School of Law by adding wikilinks. However, before continuing your work, please read over MOS:OVERLINK. In short, everyday words, occupations, and subjects that most readers would be familiar with should not be wikilinked. For example, in your recent edits, you wikilinked the terms "institute" and "religious." Both are common words that should not be wikilinked. In addition, please be careful that what when you do add a link, the link goes to the correct article. For example, you wikilinked the term "Indian" but you linked it to "India", when the reference was to the word in a Native American context. Thank you. Aoi (青い) (talk) 22:07, 13 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you i'd take closer note Starheroine (talk) 22:18, 13 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please review it more closely and stop adding links that aren't necessary or helpful for readers. ElKevbo (talk) 22:21, 13 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ANI notice

Please comment here [1]. 2601:19E:4180:6D50:65F5:930C:B0B2:CD63 (talk) 09:13, 16 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop editing grammar and punctuation

Hi! I'm a Guild of Copy Editors member who pokes around for random articles to improve. I came across some of your recent edits, and I've grown very concerned. You sometimes have had some effective edits, but unfortunately your changes more frequently worsen the text than improve it. A lot of it is completely understandable, as you seem to be picking grammatical examples where English is at its most complex!

For example, when a sentence refers to "multiple locations" we would choose the verb form "house" to correspond to that plurality of subjects, instead of "houses" like we would for a single location. This was an error you made in one of the instances I've reverted.

Some of your other errors, though, are just putting commas where they don't belong or, as you've already responded to on this talk page, overlinking. Your edit summaries themselves include some basic errors: the spelling is "grammar" not grammer, and "editing" not editting. I'm sure you can understand that, when you are making errors like these, it is somewhat disruptive for you to make tons of small changes to text written by others which has, much of the time, already been correct before you edit it.

I am sure you have good intentions, but now that you're getting input from concerned editors like me, I'd ask you to slow down and focus on the choices you're making, so as not to edit disruptively and cause unnecessary work cleaning up these mistakes. I noticed you are picking a lot of varied and interesting articles, many of which I would never have stumbled across if I hadn't checked into this issue- thanks, because I've learned more from these topics and tried to do a full copyedit on each article as I go!

Maybe, since you have this great drive to contribute across so many topics, you could focus for awhile on adding sources where those are tagged as needed? I noticed that you seem to have a good grasp on the citation formats here, which I'm still a bit intimidated by learning, so good on you! So many articles, including many of those you've been doing these edits on, have been tagged for years as needing more sources, so that could be a great contribution as you get familiar with the really extensive Manual of Style.

I have been a copyeditor for more than 20 years now, so I'm always available if you have questions or want to ping me about turns of phrase or grammatical constructions you find confusing, or even just to weigh in on anything in general. I hope you will consider my request though, and avoid changing little grammatical or punctuation details that seem "wrong" to you without consulting others first, because (other than oxford commas and removing errant spaces) your recent edits in this realm have very often been *incorrect interpretations* of fringe English use cases. Thanks, and hope you can take this in the best possible intention, as I'm confident you are just trying to improve the encyclopedia! ☺️ Cheers. Chiselinccc (talk) 08:25, 17 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. I'd take this with good heart. Starheroine (talk) 12:25, 17 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:38, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox (January 22)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Star Mississippi was:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

in-depth (not just brief mentions about the subject or routine announcements)
reliable
secondary
strictly independent of the subject

Make sure you add references that meet all four of these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to User:Starheroine/sandbox and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Star Mississippi 02:58, 22 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Starheroine! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Star Mississippi 02:58, 22 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you so much. I'd work on it. I really appreciate Starheroine (talk) 18:32, 22 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding User:Starheroine/sandbox

Hello, Starheroine. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that User:Starheroine/sandbox, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 04:05, 24 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]