User talk:Star123456789

Please read WP:V. Unsourced material can be removed on sight. A "typcial" set list is entirely unsourced as there is no such thing as a "typical set list". Furthermore, set lists are not inherently notable or informative and thus are not included on encyclopedia articles. Nouse4aname (talk) 08:05, 6 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Please also read WP:RS. YouTube is not a reliable source and cannot be used to support the set list. The main point is that a set list should be reserved for fan sites and forums and not on the encyclopedia. If the set list changed every show, would we display all of them? No, of course not. Similarly, we can select to show just a handful. A set list adds no valuable material and so is simply not included. Nouse4aname (talk) 08:08, 6 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

August 2009

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Blink-182 Reunion Tour, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted by ClueBot. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you believe there has been a mistake and would like to report a false positive, please report it here and then remove this warning from your talk page. If your edit was not vandalism, please feel free to make your edit again after reporting it. The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Blink-182 Reunion Tour was changed by Star123456789 (u) (t) deleting 7994 characters on 2009-08-06T08:49:53+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot (talk) 08:50, 6 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Blink 182

Please do grow up, and while you're at it, read WP:POINT: "do not disrupt wikipedia to make a point". The personnel section is not being challenged and so does not need a reference, whereas the tour dates are easily verified. A set list is subject to change every day, and is inherently not notable. There is simply no need to include this information. Nouse4aname (talk) 10:12, 6 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

You also seem confused that the only reason that I removed the set list was because it was unreferenced. Whilst this is one reason the material was removed, it is not the only reason. As I have explained above, set lists are simply not appropriate for inclusion in an encyclopedia article. They vary show to show and there is no way we can include all variations. A summary (providing it is sourced) stating that the band played songs from throughout their career, or whatever the case is, would be more appropriate. Nouse4aname (talk) 10:22, 6 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Stop

Your edits are becoming disruptive. You need to stop now.Theresa Knott | token threats 20:39, 6 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a short time in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for violating the three-revert rule. Please be more careful to discuss controversial changes or seek dispute resolution rather than engaging in an edit war. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here}} below, but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first.

--Orange Mike | Talk 20:58, 6 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thats a load of crap. I removed a section that was uncited. Apparently you don't understand the wikipedia rules.