User talk:Stanisław Grodyński/Archive01

Your article has been moved to AfC space

Hi! I would like to inform you that the Articles for Creation submission which was previously located here: User:Stanisław Grodyński/Andrzej Kusionowicz Grodyński has been moved to Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Andrzej Kusionowicz Grodyński, this move was made automatically and doesn't affect your article, if you have any questions please ask on my talk page! Have a nice day. ArticlesForCreationBot (talk) 15:31, 4 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation

Andrzej Kusionowicz Grodyński, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.
You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you are more than welcome to continue submitting work to Articles for Creation.
If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the Help desk or on the reviewer's talk page
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

A412 (talk) 18:41, 4 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Interlanguage links

Have inserted interlanguage links in a page I created, 'Andrzej Kusionowicz Grodyński', and in English and Polish versions of 'Gwiazdka Cieszyńska' to allow others to access useful information, even if requiring use of a web translator, but these have subsequently been removed with no explanation that I have found. Would be interested to know why this is done and whether this approach can be changed?? StanG 16:26, 8 January 2012 (UTC)

Wikipedia rules

I strongly encourage you to read Wikipedia rules and adhere to them, especially the ones regarding citing reliable sources and referencing. Wikipedia rules and guidelines are Wikipedia requirements, not any "editor requirements". Regards. - Darwinek (talk) 19:20, 13 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Had read through the citation rules and thought I was following them but it seems my interpretation was incorrect - apologies for this and thank you for your patience and understanding - hopefully my contributions will improve technically as I get more experience - regards 22:01, 13 January 2012 (UTC)

Photos

I categorized your photos on commons, just a hint that there exist a category: commons:Category:Courthouse in Cieszyn, it's a cultural heritage monument building. Cheers from Cieszyn Silesia. D_T_G (P L) 13:55, 5 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your help and advice - I will be adding other photos of historic buildings and monuments in future, from Cieszyn and other towns in Poland - am also thinking of adding copies of historical 'portrait photos' that have been handed down in my family although am not sure that this is an appropriate site for them - will try to add appropriate categories for all photos I do upload!

Please, read: commons:Commons:Overcat#Over-categorization. It was enough when this File:Cieszyn Building VB.jpg had only this category: commons:Category:Antoni Osuchowski Lyceum in Cieszyn since this category is already in commons:Category:Schools in Cieszyn which is included in commons:Category:Buildings in Cieszyn. So if this picture has categories Antoni Osuchowski Lyceum in Cieszyn (which is the school I graduated btw) and Buildings in Cieszyn it is over-categorization. Cheers, D_T_G (P L) 10:06, 26 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent edits

Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You could also click on the signature button or located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when they said it. Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 06:24, 7 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Alicja

Hello. I understand, that you are not a Polish speaker. :) Alicja is a female name, meaning Alice. Z Alicją is "with Alice" in Polish. "Without Alice" would be "bez Alicji" etc. That's a common typo of English Wikipedians translating text from Polish. :) - Darwinek (talk) 06:56, 7 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Are the other references to Alicją in the AKG article therefore also incorrect, or are these OK? [Note that further 'editorial changes' have been made by 'A412'.]--StanG 07:07, 7 March 2012 (UTC)

Possible conflict of interest

Hello, Stanisław Grodyński. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about in the page Stanisław Sylwester Alfonzy Grodyński, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:

avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, colleagues, company, organization or competitors;
propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (you can use the {{request edit}} template);
disclose your conflict of interest when discussing affected articles (see Wikipedia:Conflict of interest#How to disclose a COI);
avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see WP:Spam);
do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure.

Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you. – Jonesey95 (talk) 18:28, 18 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Comment: @Jonesey95: Thank you for taking the time to review the article relating to my grandfather, Stanisław Sylwester Alfonzy Grodyński. Unfortunately I was in the middle of editing the text when I was suddenly called away and not being familiar with article writing and COI terms became confused as to what happened to the changes I had pending. Given my inexperience here I am still not sure that what I have done is consistent with Wikipedia procedures but hopefully the article is now transparently consistent with these. I would stress that I am not creating this text but simply extracting it, and sometimes condensing it, from the book referenced and other records and materials (more text and further references have still to be added). Please advise if I have made any errors in my attempts to rectify the matters you have brought to my attention, or should there be further immediate actions required on my part? Thanks again --StanG 11:03, 19 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Stanisław Sylwester Alfonzy Grodyński moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Stanisław Sylwester Alfonzy Grodyński, is not suitable as written to remain published. Obviously, there is a large COI issue. Please see WP:COI. In addition, it needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. Not only to satisfy WP:VERIFY, but also to show that he passes WP:GNG, since he does not meet WP:NSOLDIER.(?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 15:10, 11 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

References

Your submission at Articles for creation: Stanisław Sylwester Alfonzy Grodyński (April 2)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by -noah- was:

This submission does not appear to be written in the formal tone expected of an encyclopedia article. Entries should be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources. Please rewrite your submission in a more encyclopedic format. Please make sure to avoid peacock terms that promote the subject.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Stanisław Sylwester Alfonzy Grodyński and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Stanisław Sylwester Alfonzy Grodyński, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Noah ^💬 15:11, 2 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Stanisław Grodyński! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Noah ^💬 15:11, 2 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Stanisław Sylwester Alfonzy Grodyński (September 4)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Modussiccandi were:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

This submission does not appear to be written in the formal tone expected of an encyclopedia article. Entries should be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources. Please rewrite your submission in a more encyclopedic format. Please make sure to avoid peacock terms that promote the subject.

The comment the reviewer left was:

This article is extremely long but almost no attempt is made at complying with our guidelines on referencing and verifiability. Please remember that material likely to be challenged needs to be supported with inline citations. See WP:V, WP:CITE

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Stanisław Sylwester Alfonzy Grodyński and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Stanisław Sylwester Alfonzy Grodyński, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Modussiccandi (talk) 20:31, 4 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Modussiccandi: Thank you for taking the time to review this proposed article.

With reference to the reasons given for declining the article I would like to make the following points, although given I am a relative novice to publishing articles on Wikipedia I understand my grasp of the references you have quoted may be limited.

1. As much of the information in the article was contained in the same source, The Grodynski Brigade (written by my father Andrzej and published nearly ten years ago without, to my knowledge, any challenges in the meantime), I did not think it necessary to provide repeated inline citations, but have included additional citations wherever there may be important details that could be contested, where these are available. Should I repeat citations to the same source throughout the article where appropriate?

2. Stanislaw, my grandfather, following WWI worked for the Polish Ministry of the Interior, so naturally much of his work was not 'public', but a cursory examination of his 'parallel role' as a 'Governor' (Starost) indicates that his appointments were strategically of high importance for Poland given their proximites to Russia (now Ukraine and Belarus) and Germany\Prussia (now north-west Poland). These appointments are all verifiable and there is evidence in newspapers of the day of his military status during WWII in representing Polish Forces at the Garibaldi Commemoration in Italy. The requirement to remain in the background with regard to his activities associated with the Ministry of the Interior extended to his role in support of the Polish Government in Exile, in London, following WWII.

3. With the substantial revisions to the first proposed article I attempted to change the wording into a more 'encyclopedic format' and remove any "Peacock Terms" but it seems I have been unsuccessful in this and would appreciate any advice or identification of specific words or expressions that should be changed? --StanG 11:11, 5 September 2021 (UTC)

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:30, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Stanisław Sylwester Alfonzy Grodyński (February 28)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by AngusWOOF were:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

This submission does not appear to be written in the formal tone expected of an encyclopedia article. Entries should be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources. Please rewrite your submission in a more encyclopedic format. Please make sure to avoid peacock terms that promote the subject.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Sources point mostly to primaries written by family members, and documents that can't be vetted except by the family members. Needs a lot more secondary sources external to the subject. Wikipedia is not a memorial service.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Stanisław Sylwester Alfonzy Grodyński and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Stanisław Sylwester Alfonzy Grodyński, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

AngusW🐶🐶F (bark • sniff) 21:26, 28 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]