User talk:Stan Simmons

Welcome

Welcome!

Hello, Stan Simmons, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}} before the question. Again, welcome! Kip Kip 08:30, 12 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Your Edits.

On a recent edit on Operation Repo you removed the citation needed tags. Was there a reason for doing so? Please keep in mind that until we can source those claims the tags should stay put.Hell In A Bucket (talk) 13:30, 25 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Good Job

Well it would appear there is a source that states the show is fictional, good job finding it. Hell In A Bucket (talk) 14:01, 28 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

ERRR Operation Repo that is. Hell In A Bucket (talk) 14:01, 28 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 day for attempting to harass other users. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make constructive contributions. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here}} below, but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first. Ged UK 20:28, 1 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for enabling their harassment. Stan Simmons (talk) 20:30, 1 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Stan Simmons (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Blocked by request of User:Turian, who has labeled my edits as vandalism and engaged in Wiki-bullying with other members of WP:PW over useless references to professional wrestling being edited from articles. This block is nothing more than a continuation of said harassment, which also includes allegations of sockpuppetry.

Decline reason:

Even if this account isn't a sockpuppet, I get the impression that you're only here to make a point. You're very lucky you weren't blocked indefinitely. Blueboy 96 22:49, 1 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

I am permitted to request action be taken against vandalism. I still don't know where this harassment tangent stems from, but I assure you that is has no grounds in validity. Take a look at his contributions. Any clear-headed administrator would definitely deny this block. –Turian (talk) 20:36, 1 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Edits you don't agree with aren't vandalism. Vandalism is a rather strong word to throw around when you're unable to prove how it applies. Stan Simmons (talk) 20:56, 1 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The burden of proof lies with you and your unsourced and biased edits. Also, many users have told you to stop. You are not a martyr. –Turian (talk) 21:00, 1 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

If you are going to accuse me of something, the burden of proof is on you. Stan Simmons (talk) 21:45, 1 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

And what have I accused you of? Being a vandal? Yes, and my proof lies within your contributions. Your turn. –Turian (talk) 21:49, 1 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

You are improperly using the term "vandalism". What you and your fellow cabal members are engaging in qualifies as "harassment". Anyone outside of and not connected to the WP:PW lynch mob will see that. Stan Simmons (talk) 22:51, 1 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Stop being a drama queen, please. There is no lynch mob from PW. We have administrators that agree with us. WP:GETOVERIT. –Turian (talk) 22:59, 1 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Your comment "There is no lynch mob from PW" is contradicted by your next comment: "We have administrators that agree with us".

The only thing missing from your last rant was, "Resistance is futile. You will be assimilated." Otherwise, you've done a fantastic job demonstrating exactly what I have been talking about. Stan Simmons (talk) 23:18, 1 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Stan Simmons (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

An indefinite block has been placed on my account as the last step in a campaign of harassment and misinformation from WP:PW. They are claiming I am a "sockpuppet" of another user, when I have been editing here for almost two years. I politely request a reversal of this decision from someone not connected to this bullying cabal.

Decline reason:

See WP:NOTTHEM and try again. Sandstein 16:22, 2 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Stan Simmons (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

An indefinite block has been placed on my account after claims that I am a "sockpuppet" of another user. I have been editing here for almost two years (since June 2008). All of my edits have been in good faith, and I have edited a wide variety of articles on different subjects.

Decline reason:

evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Paul Harald Kaspar/Archive is overwhelmingly convincing. This account started editing a few months after the earlier account was blocked, with a few intervening socks. It seems clear that you are maintaining two accounts to give the illusion of greater support for your particular causes. This is unacceptable. --Jayron32 02:48, 3 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.