User talk:Stallman-san

Welcome!

Hello, Stallman-san, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as Inception client, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may not be retained.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! TheMagicWallet (talk) 06:10, 8 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I suppose it's for the best. :'( Stallman-san (talk) 00:33, 10 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Inception client

The article Inception client has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

The item about which this article is written is not "notable" pursuant to the notability guidelines, which clearly state that:

The item for which an article is being written, or has been written, must have received coverage from a notable and/or reliable independent party
- Furthermore, said coverage must be primarily concerned with aforementioned item
The article must not be an advertisement
The article must cite aforementioned indpendent sources

This article is in violation of the above guidelines in that it:

Has not been covered in any capacity by a notable independent part
Has a commercial tone, and directs the reader toward an outlet at which they may purchase the item
Does not cite sources (cited references are owner-generated content)

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. TheMagicWallet (talk) 06:10, 8 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Inception client

Hello, Stallman-san. I wanted to let you know that I’m proposing an article that you started, Inception client, for deletion because I don't think it meets our criteria for inclusion. If you don't want the article deleted:

edit the page
remove the text that looks like this: {{proposed deletion/dated...}}
save the page

Also, be sure to explain why you think the article should be kept in your edit summary or on the article's talk page. If you don't do so, it may be deleted later anyway.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Thanks, Lukeno94 (tell Luke off here) 13:20, 26 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Platypus Initiative (October 14)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Majora was:

This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability. Wikipedia requires significant coverage about the subject in reliable sources that are independent of the subject—see the general guideline on notability and the golden rule. Please improve the submission's referencing (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners), so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia. If additional reliable sources cannot be found for the subject, then it may not be suitable for Wikipedia at this time.

The comment the reviewer left was:

You really only have one good reference [1]. The rest are either not independent or don't add anything to show that the subject meets our criteria. Please see WP:42 for more details on what we are looking for.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Platypus Initiative and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Majora (talk) 03:24, 14 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Stallman-san, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Majora (talk) 03:24, 14 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Platypus Initiative concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Platypus Initiative, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:32, 28 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Platypus Initiative

Hello, Stallman-san. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Platypus Initiative".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Legacypac (talk) 07:52, 25 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]