User talk:Ssudhanthevar

October 2012

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one of your recent edits has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
For help, take a look at the introduction.
The following is the log entry regarding this message: Peravurani was changed by Ssudhanthevar (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.981652 on 2012-10-28T14:15:30+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 14:15, 28 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

May 2013

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Peravurani may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 11:24, 10 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

September 2015

Hello, I'm 2601:188:0:ABE6:65F5:930C:B0B2:CD63. I noticed that you made a change to an article, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. 2601:188:0:ABE6:65F5:930C:B0B2:CD63 (talk) 13:30, 30 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm 2601:188:0:ABE6:65F5:930C:B0B2:CD63. I wanted to let you know that I undid one or more of your recent contributions because they appeared to be promotional. Advertising and using Wikipedia as a "soapbox" are against Wikipedia policy and not permitted. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about Wikipedia. Thank you. 2601:188:0:ABE6:65F5:930C:B0B2:CD63 (talk) 13:30, 30 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I'm adding the following warning, because I've found that you copied content directly from the institution's website. WP:COI guidelines may be relevant, as well.

Your addition has been removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. 2601:188:0:ABE6:65F5:930C:B0B2:CD63 (talk) 13:42, 30 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

October 2015

Hello, I'm Vin09. Your recent edit to the page Tirupati appears to have added incorrect information, so I have removed it for now. If you believe the information was correct, please cite a reliable source or discuss your change on the article's talk page. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Vin09 (talk) 15:39, 9 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent editing history at Mumbai shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you get reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Thomas.W ^talk 17:39, 9 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Warning

Please stop randomly adding Tamil and other scripts across multiple articles. This is the English Wikipedia and we have consensus to only use the official script, if necessary, in infoboxes. Continuing to do so will see you lose your editing privileges. —SpacemanSpiff 17:56, 9 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Final warning

Your edits are now very very disruptive, repeatedly adding Tamil to unrelated articles. You will be blocked if you continue this crusade.—SpacemanSpiff 18:14, 9 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

You must reply to these messages and discuss before editing articles again. --NeilN ^{talk to me} 18:20, 9 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

October 2015

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for persistent disruptive editing. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. NeilN ^{talk to me} 18:24, 9 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

As you have not responded to any messages, this block should stay in place until you indicate you will stop your article edits and start discussing them. --NeilN ^{talk to me} 18:26, 9 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]