User talk:Ssshaane

June 2020

Hello, I'm Prahlad balaji. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, I Am the Walrus, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at the tutorial on citing sources. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. --Stay safe, ◊PRAHLAD^balaji (M•T•A•C) This message was left at 16:32, 1 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Rock of the Westies, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Binksternet (talk) 16:09, 15 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Elton John certifications

Hi Ssshaane, just wanted to leave you an explanation, in case you think I'm hounding you... the RIAA certifications you were adding for Elton John's singles were effectively the same thing as the certification already in the table. At that time during the 1970s, RIAA awarded a gold certification for one million sales and platinum for two million sales. In 1989, RIAA halved the sales levels required for certifications, so a gold certification was now 500,000 sales and platinum one million sales. But RIAA stated that any record released and certified before 1989 could be re-certified at the new levels. So "Island Girl", for example, sold one million copies in 1975 and was certified gold for that amount in December that year. After 1989 those one million sales now qualified to be re-certified as a platinum disc... but it's for the same million sales in physical copies.

RIAA's website is a big problem because every sales level they show for certifications before 1989 is wrong – if a record was certified in gold in 1984, the sales level is still shown as 0.5 million instead of the correct figure of one million. This is a serious error on their part, but there's no way of contacting them to get them to correct it. Wikipedia is coded to show the correct sales amount, providing the correct "certyear" parameter is entered in the certifications table. Richard3120 (talk) 18:37, 19 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

June 2020

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to add unsourced or poorly sourced content, as you did at In My Life, you may be blocked from editing. Sundayclose (talk) 20:30, 27 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked as a sockpuppet

This account has been blocked indefinitely as a suspected sock puppet of Dabossman1000000 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · page moves · block user · logs · block log · arb · rfc · lta · SPI · cuwiki) that was created to violate Wikipedia policy. Note that using multiple accounts is allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not, and that all edits made while evading a block or ban may be reverted or deleted. If this is a sock puppet account, and your original account is blocked, please also note that banned or blocked users are not allowed to edit Wikipedia; and all edits made under this account may be reverted. If this account is not a sock puppet, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below. Dreamy Jazz ^{talk to me | my contributions} 22:44, 16 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Administrators reviewing any unblock request can email me for evidence, but the evidence presented in the SPI report is useful reading. Dreamy Jazz ^{talk to me | my contributions} 22:53, 16 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]