User talk:Sreehari sharma

March 2018

Hello, I'm Qzd. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Kurukkal, but you didn't provide a source. I’ve removed it for now, but if you’d like to include a citation to a reliable source and re-add it, please do so! If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Qzd (talk) 17:16, 29 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Please be aware

Since you are still making poor contributions, I think you need to be made aware of the information below. Thanks. - Sitush (talk) 15:34, 27 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The Wikipedia community has permitted administrators to impose discretionary sanctions on any editor who is active on any page about social groups, explicitly including caste associations and political parties, related to India, Pakistan, Sri Lanka, Bangladesh and Nepal. Discretionary sanctions can be used against an editor who repeatedly or seriously fails to adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, any expected standards of behavior, or any normal editorial process. If you engage in inappropriate behavior in this area, you may be placed under sanctions, which can include blocks, a revert limitation, or a topic ban. The discussion leading to the imposition of these sanctions can be read here.

Please familiarise yourself with the information page at Wikipedia:General sanctions/South Asian social groups.

A belated welcome!

Here's wishing you a belated welcome to Wikipedia, Sreehari sharma. I see that you've already been around a while and wanted to thank you for your contributions. Though you seem to have been successful in finding your way around, you may benefit from following some of the links below, which help editors get the most out of Wikipedia:

Also, when you post on talk pages you should sign your name using four tildes (~~~~); that should automatically produce your username and the date after your post.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! If you have any questions, feel free to leave me a message on my talk page, consult Wikipedia:Questions, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there.

Again, welcome! Sitush (talk) 15:36, 27 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Wikistarndards

Your sources are to be cited in accordance with the standards of Wikipedia.-Wikimankerala (talk) 12:33, 2 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

June 2018

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Kurukkal. Sitush (talk) 19:36, 5 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for making legal threats or taking legal action.

You are not allowed to edit Wikipedia while the threats stand or the legal action is unresolved.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. —SpacemanSpiff 08:50, 7 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

unblock

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Sreehari sharma (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Sir, my position in my opinion is correct. The person named sitush is giving false information about my community. As you know spreading false information is a serious offence. It is my responsibility to respond while some one insults my community. You may or may not remove the block. But i will act against the insult through all possible means. You should have heard my side before making a decision to block me. Sir, sitush has warned me that he will block me from editing don't you have any problem with it? I have done so because i have very poor knowledge about the conditions here in wikipedia. My request is to remove the restriction and to impose restriction on sitush from editing the page kurukkals. I would like to inform you that in any condition my actions will not stop till you restrict sitush from the page kurukkals and remove the false and insulting comments made by him in that page. Sreehari sharma (talk) 09:09, 7 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Per our policies on legal threats, you will not be unblocked until either your legal action has been completed, or your threat to undertake such an action has been unambiguously withdrawn. As it appears that this request is doubling down on your threat, I am afraid that I am unable to unblock you at this time. SQL ^{Query me!} 09:14, 7 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Unblock

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Sreehari sharma (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I'm ready to withdraw my comment that you treat as leagal threat. But the insult made by sitush should be addressed. The page may be removed. Or his edit should be removed. Sreehari sharma (talk) 09:33, 7 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

"Ready to withdraw" is not the same thing as withdrawing. You need to clearly state that you are not taking legal action in this matter. You can pursue your grievances in the courts of your country or on Wikipedia, not both. I'm also not sure that you understand that Wikipedia content is based on what independent reliable sources state about a subject(such as books). If the sources are incorrect in some way. you need to discuss that issue on the article talk page or in another appropriate forum(such as WP:RSN). Until you understand this, clearly withdraw your legal threat, and explain what you will do to resolve any disputes you are in that discussion does not resolve, you can't be unblocked. As such, I am declining this request. 331dot (talk) 10:00, 7 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Unblock

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who accepted the request.

Sreehari sharma (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I'm withdrawing my leagal threat. Please give instructions to complaint about the edit made by someone. Sreehari sharma (talk) 10:09, 7 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Accept reason:

Since you have withdrawn your legal threat, I am lifting the block on your account. Please see this page for information about Wikipedia's dispute resolution process. Yunshui ^雲 _水 10:22, 7 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Kurukkal

After twice being reverted since your block, your third edit was this. You have posted that to the wrong place - you need to create a report at WP:DRN - but in any event it will go nowhere because you haven't even followed the first step of dispute resolution, which is to discuss the issue on the talk page of the article.

For what it is worth, you don't have much chance there, either. As my comments there point out, you are trying to run a coach and horses through our policies just because you disagree with something. You can't do that and the source does indeed refer to the information that you do not like. Your only hope would be to get consensus that the source in question is unreliable and I doubt that will happen. - Sitush (talk) 06:16, 8 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

June 2018

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for persistently making disruptive edits.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Yunshui ^雲 _水 08:05, 8 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

It's very clear from your last few edits that you have no intention of trying to understand or comply with Wikipedia's policies and processes. Your behaviour is disrupting the operation of the encyclopedia, and you will not be permitted to edit again until we are convinced that you understand and will abide by the site's guidelines. Yunshui ^雲 _水 08:07, 8 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Block

Sir No i know you give importance to rules only you does not care about the contents. When i raised a serious concern you were refusing in intervene. Now when i removed false information and insultive comments you are acting against me. Sir, please do remember that this insults a community. This time i will not request to lift the block. But just remember, you could make me scilent by blocking, but the truth will continue to flow. Our God lord Srikrishna once said about this yuga (the present time is kaliyuga according to hindu mythology) that in kaliyuga the truth may not win always but it will resonate till the truth wins. I expected that as an organaization Wikipedia will look into my concerns. Now I understands that Wikipedia gives priority to its Policies not to the truth. I would like tell you that policies should be favourable for the truth to grow otherwise the policies should be thrown into the ocean. With regards Sreehari Sreehari sharma (talk) 17:36, 8 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Please read WP:TRUTH. We cannot simply take your word that something is "true", nor can you simply assert something is "true" and expect other editors to fall in line. You must discuss the issue. You have to be able to prove it with a reliable source, or demonstrate why the existing reliable sources are inaccurate. If you cannot or will not do that, then yes, you should not participate here. This is a collaborative project with people from all over this planet. You have to be able to collaborate and follow the policies and guidelines that have been laid down. 331dot (talk) 17:43, 8 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]