User talk:Squiver
Appearance
Squiver, you are invited to the Teahouse!
[edit]![]() |
Hi Squiver! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from peers and experienced editors. I hope to see you there! Missvain (I'm a Teahouse host) This message was delivered automatically by your robot friend, HostBot (talk) 16:12, 2 February 2015 (UTC) |
February 2015
[edit]![]() | This account has been blocked indefinitely as a sock puppet that was created to violate Wikipedia policy. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not, and that all edits made while evading a block or ban may be reverted or deleted. If this account is not a sock puppet, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. — Mr. Stradivarius ♪ talk ♪ 12:48, 10 February 2015 (UTC) |
- Not a surprise, Mr. Stradivarius; at least it's not to me. When I first saw this account, and looked at the edit history...I knew. My user page is clear that I usually recognize these editors as non-new. I was tempted to question Squiver about which account he or she previously edited under, as I've done with some other accounts that I recognized as non-new, but there's always that nagging WP:Assume good faith thing, and people who may think I yell "Sockpuppet!" too much. Anyway, I see that you indefinitely blocked Squiver as a WP:Sockpuppet of Sardanaphalus. Thanks for tackling the abuse. Flyer22 (talk) 12:56, 10 February 2015 (UTC)
Notice
[edit] There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The thread is Block review - Squiver and Sardanaphalus. Thank you. — Mr. Stradivarius ♪ talk ♪ 15:11, 10 February 2015 (UTC)