User talk:YayArylea

This is YayArylea's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Your submission at Articles for creation: SQUIDS FROM SPACE (October 17)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Whispering was:

This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability. Wikipedia requires significant coverage (not just mere mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject—see the general guideline on notability, the golden rule and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. Please improve the submission's referencing (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners and Help:Introduction to referencing/1), so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia. If additional reliable sources cannot be found for the subject, then it may not be suitable for Wikipedia at this time.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Article has no references at all.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:SQUIDS FROM SPACE and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Whispe ring 23:49, 17 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! SquidsFromSpace, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Whispe ring 23:49, 17 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

There have been two problems with this account: the account has been used for advertising or promotion, which is contrary to the purpose of Wikipedia, and your username indicates that the account represents a business or other organisation or group, which is also against policy, as an account must be for just one person. Because of those problems, the account has been blocked indefinitely from editing.

If you intend to make useful contributions about some topic other than your business or organisation, you may request an unblock. To do so, post the text {{unblock-spamun|Your proposed new username|Your reason here}} at the bottom of your talk page. Replace the text "Your proposed new username" with a new username you are willing to use. See Special:CentralAuth to search for available usernames. Your new username will need to meet our username policy. Replace the text "Your reason here" with your reason to be unblocked. In that reason, you must:

Convince us that you understand the reason for your block and that you will not repeat the kind of edits for which you were blocked.
Describe in general terms the contributions that you intend to make if you are unblocked.

If you believe this block was made in error, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here}} at the bottom of your talk page, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Alexf^(talk) 00:28, 18 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This user's request to be unblocked to request a change in username has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without a good reason (see the blocking policy). Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

YayArylea (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Requested username:

FBIJoanna (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)

Request reason:

I am new to Wikipedia and have never made a page before. I did not quite understand what was acceptable. I am looking to make a Squids From Space wiki page for our community to look at and contribute to.

Decline reason:

Inappropriate proposed username Just Chilling (talk) 18:28, 18 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This user's request to be unblocked to request a change in username has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without a good reason (see the blocking policy). Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

YayArylea (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Requested username:

FBIJoanna (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)

Request reason:

I am new to Wikipedia and have never made a page before. I did not quite understand what was acceptable. I am looking to make a Squids From Space wiki page for our community to look at and contribute to.

Decline reason:

Inappropriate proposed username Just Chilling (talk) 18:28, 18 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

SquidsFromSpace (talk) 16:07, 18 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I am not comfortable with your proposed username 'FBIJoanna' that implies some official status. You may choose again by editing the template. Just Chilling (talk) 16:44, 18 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of User:SquidsFromSpace

A tag has been placed on your user page, User:SquidsFromSpace, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be blatant advertising which only promotes or publicises a company, product, group or service. This is a violation of our policies regarding acceptable use of user pages — user pages are intended for active editors of Wikipedia to communicate with one another as part of the process of creating encyclopedic content, and should not be mistaken for free webhosting resources or advertising space. Please read the guidelines on spam, the guidelines on user pages, and, especially, our FAQ for Organizations.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. L3X1 (distænt write) 16:28, 18 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This user's request to be unblocked to request a change in username has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without a good reason (see the blocking policy). Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

YayArylea (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Requested username:

YayArylea (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)

Request reason:

I intend to fix the errors provided to me in the feedback I was given. Please, if I could have a chance to do so.

Decline reason:

Procedural decline as duplicate request. Just Chilling (talk) 18:30, 18 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This user's request to be unblocked to request a change in username has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without a good reason (see the blocking policy). Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

YayArylea (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Requested username:

YayArylea (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)

Request reason:

I intend to fix the errors provided to me in the feedback I was given. Please, if I could have a chance to do so.

Decline reason:

Procedural decline. Only one request at a time, please. Huon (talk) 20:20, 18 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Globally renamed 'SquidsFromSpace' to 'YayArylea'. Just Chilling (talk) 18:24, 18 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Unblock request

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

YayArylea (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I have read and understood the reasons for my block. Due to being new, I made quite a few errors with the article I wrote and would like a chance to fix them. I have taken some time to look at some templates and know the changes I must make

Decline reason:

The explanation below doesn't address the more basic issues: That you have a conflict of interest and are promoting a game that doesn't meet Wikipedia's standards of notability. Huon (talk) 22:43, 18 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

YayArylea (talk) 18:39, 18 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Please describe in general terms what those errors were and how you'd go about fixing them. Currently I am not convinced that having you write about that game would be to Wikipedia's benefit. Huon (talk) 20:20, 18 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@Huon: Sure! No problem. Originally, my page was flagged for not having any references. This was my mistake as I figured I could just submit the page and then continue editing it later with more information when I had more time to work on it. So I submitted an incomplete page that had minimal information on it. When I saw that it was flagged for no references, I threw in the link for the website thinking all it was needing was just something filled in that section to be accepted, so then my page was then marked as promotion and deleted. I planned to add information regarding the history of the game (it is the spiritual successor to another game called Fat Princess on the PS4). There are many articles written on it comparing the two games that I can cite. I had also planned to write about the lore and the developers behind the game. I have looked at proper examples of game pages and what's expected. YayArylea (talk) 20:42, 18 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

YayArylea (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I understand the initial reasons given for the block, but they were due to my ignorance as a new Wikipedia user. I've taken the time to do some more learning and have made a google doc for what I had hoped my original article to look like using other pages as reference. I'll even seek out someone who is more experienced in editing on Wikipedia to review my document before submission. https://docs.google.com/document/d/1owAQ7Btm0uQYDbiMvkyvHU_eFpApqsQTIyBZV8L8yXw/edit?usp=sharing Thank you for your time YayArylea (talk) 16:26, 20 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Letting you write about your products on Wikipedia doesn't strike me as being in Wikipedia's best interests. If you don't have any plans here beyond plugging your company's game, there's no reason for us to unblock your account. Yunshui ^雲 _水 08:01, 23 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.