User talk:Squeezebenz

October 2024

Hello, I'm JoBoGamer. I noticed that you recently removed content from 22Gz without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. JoBo Gamer (contribs) 17:34, 17 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

November 2024

Please do not add original research or novel syntheses of published material to articles as you apparently did to World of T-Shirts. Please cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. Thank you. ABG (Talk/Report any mistakes here) 04:53, 5 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Squeezebenz moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Squeezebenz. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because you may have a possible Conflict of Interest. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit for review" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Killarnee (talk) 02:32, 11 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Managing a conflict of interest

Hello, Squeezebenz. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on the page Draft:Squeezebenz, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for article subjects for more information. We ask that you:

avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, colleagues, company, organization, clients, or competitors;
propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (you can use the {{edit COI}} template), including links or details of reliable sources that support your suggestions;
disclose your conflict of interest when discussing affected articles (see Wikipedia:Conflict of interest § How to disclose a COI);
avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam § External link spamming);
do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure.

Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicizing, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you. Killarnee (talk) 02:33, 11 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello I wanted to make this clear I am not squeezebenz this is just an article about the internet personality so there is no actual conflict of interest so what you have said is futile I can fix everything else also for the photo the photo was released to the public because it is a mugshot so there is no possible copyright issues since it is a government photo that was released to the public Squeezebenz (talk) 04:18, 16 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Squeezebenz (December 16)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Dan arndt were:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The content of this submission includes material that does not meet Wikipedia's minimum standard for inline citations. Please cite your sources using footnotes. For instructions on how to do this, please see Referencing for beginners. Thank you.

The comment the reviewer left was:

YouTube and Twitter are not acceptable or reliable sources. Needs more significant coverage.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Squeezebenz and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Dan arndt (talk) 05:53, 16 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Squeezebenz! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Dan arndt (talk) 05:53, 16 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]