User talk:Spyingcactus

November 2011

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, but at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Engineering, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted (undone) by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been considered as unconstructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to place "{{helpme}}" on your talk page and someone will drop by to help.
The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Engineering was changed by Spyingcactus (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.955131 on 2011-11-28T00:41:39+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 00:41, 28 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent edits

Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You could also click on the signature button or located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 01:14, 28 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

talk page comments

Please stop adding your personal opinions about what people/characters may have certain diseases. Wikipedia articles must be based on reliable sources, not our own opinions. Furthermore, talk pages are not a place to generally discuss a topic (i.e, Wikipedia isn't a social networking site or online forum for general conversation), but just a place for suggesting article improvements. Of course, if you find reliable sources that have these diagnoses (note that these would have to be very reliable, not just speculation), then we could consider adding the info. Thanks. Qwyrxian (talk) 01:41, 28 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I just saw your comments on my page now (they were deleted by another user because you mistakenly removed another editor's comments). After this message, I won't post here any more. I just wanted to apologize if you felt I offended you in any way. I was merely trying to explain to you, as a new user, how Wikipedia works. I didn't mean to be rude. Many new users don't understand that Wikipedia is not a place for people to just propose theories or discuss topics. Talk pages are only for improving the article, and articles are always improved with reliable sources, not our personal opinions. If you want to help improve WP articles, you are more than welcome to stay. Qwyrxian (talk) 02:13, 29 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]