User talk:Spsantos

Welcome!

Hello, Spsantos, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as Sunnies Studios, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may not be retained.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{help me}} on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! §FreeRangeFrog^croak 21:03, 1 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Sunnies Studios

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Sunnies Studios, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. §FreeRangeFrog^croak 21:03, 1 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Reply

Hi, thanks for message. I deleted your article because

Although your provided references, they were not all adequate as independent verifiable sources. ISources that are not acceptable include social media and other sites that can be self-edited, blogs, websites of unknown or non-reliable provenance, and sites that are just reporting what the company claims or interviewing its management (like the last one). Although your company is probably notable, you tell us little about the company itself other than locations. How many employees? Turnover? Profits?
it was written in a promotional tone. Articles must be neutral and encyclopaedic. Examples of unsourced claims presented as fact include: The company is known for its vintage-inspired aesthetic and taking inspiration from styles from past decades... l and local celebrity... s offers an array of retro-inspired sunglasses and specs for men and women
Not reasons for deletion, but references shouldn't be in full caps even if they were in the original. Also only wikilink once to each item, Wilson is linked every time
If you have a conflict of interest when editing this article, you must declare it. If, after reading the information about notability linked above, you still believe that your organisation is notable enough for a Wikipedia article (and that there is significant coverage in reliable, independent secondary sources), you could, if you wish, post a request at Wikipedia:Requested articles for the article to be created. See also Wikipedia:Best practices for editors with conflicts of interest.
I looked at Warby Parker, which needs some work, but it does have more hard facts than yours.

You article isn't awful compared to many, and I'll restore the text to a userbox for you to polish if you wish Jimfbleak - talk to me? 05:45, 3 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]