User talk:Sprout333
Links
[edit]
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to the encyclopedia, one or more of the external links you added do not comply with our guidelines for external links and have been removed. Wikipedia is not a collection of links; nor should it be used as a platform for advertising or promotion, and doing so is contrary to the goals of this project. Because Wikipedia uses nofollow tags, external links do not alter search engine rankings. If you feel the link should be added to the article, please discuss it on the article's talk page before reinserting it. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you.--John (talk) 16:06, 24 February 2010 (UTC)
- Hi, I was under the impression that librarians and archivists were being encouraged to add links to their holdings when appropriate: see Editors who may have a conflict of interest: Subject and culture sector professionals and Advice for the cultural sector As advised, I submitted a proposal to Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Physics Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Physics -- Proposed Photo Links to add links to Emilio Segrè Visual Archives (ESVA) photo holdings and met with no resistance. Perhaps it would be better submit the proposed change to each page individually, or maybe to just link to the ESVA homepage (and not search results) -- or is there any reason not to link to ESVA at all? Can you advise? Sprout333 (talk) 18:15, 24 February 2010 (UTC)
- Thank you. I wasn't aware of the central discussion that you had. It would have been wiser to add something in the edit summary that mentioned that discussion. I am not sure that I agree however that these links really add much to the articles, as they are quite small and are not free for use on our project. I am torn both ways on this one and will go with whatever consensus is arrived at on the central discussion, which I will contribute to. Thanks for contributing, and I am sorry I had to remove the links you added as they had the appearance of spamming. Any time I see someone adding multiple links to the same site like that I would do the same. --John (talk) 21:31, 24 February 2010 (UTC)
- Why in the world were these reverted? These are wonderful links, to wonderful pictures that are hard to come across. There's nothing wrong with adding links to non-free content we can't ourselves use! I implore you John, please reconsider. It's exactly this type of content we want in the external links. Headbomb {ταλκκοντριβς – WP Physics} 16:24, 1 March 2010 (UTC)