User talk:Splongul

This box is for positive comments

(Kindly leave any positive comments here)

This box is for negative comments

(This box is for negative comments. I'd rather it was left empty)

License tagging for Image:Congumerate removal.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Congumerate removal.jpg. Wikipedia gets thousands of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 12:06, 21 March 2007 (UTC)

Congumerate - prodwarning

Congumerate

I have added a "{{prod}}" template to the article Congumerate, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but I don't believe it satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and I've explained why in the deletion notice (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may contest the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached.

If you feel there is the need for a separate article, and given that much of this is derived from the Chewing gum article, you should consider using the guidelines. Perhaps start with reviewing Wikipedia:Summary style and Splitting_an_article.

However, I think the initial question - has the Chewing gum article grown unwieldy - has not been satisfied. You would need a lot more material to justify moving the text outside the gum article, I believe. Shenme 20:18, 21 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

BTW: I have not even tried to start an article here, so I am not unsympathetic. I like the picture, and hope you can reassure on the permissions questions. It would look great back in the Chewing gum article! Shenme 20:21, 21 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Megamillion

Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Megamillion, by Sarregouset (talk · contribs), another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Megamillion fits the criteria for speedy deletion for the following reason:

there is no such word

To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Megamillion, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Please note, this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion, it did not nominate Megamillion itself. Feel free to leave a message on the bot operator's talk page if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot. --Android Mouse Bot 2 23:09, 26 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of User:194.74.230.119

A tag has been placed on User:194.74.230.119, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia per CSD g10.

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not meet basic Wikipedia criteria may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as an appropriate article, and if you can indicate why the subject of this article is appropriate, you may contest the tagging. To do this, add {{hangon}} on the top of the article and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm its subject's notability under the guidelines.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion. To do this, add {{hangon}} on the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag) and leave a note on the page's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. Gscshoyru 17:04, 17 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]