If you have any comments or concerns, feel free to leave me a message. I will usually reply to you on this talk page within a day; if not, I'm probably away somewhere.
Please try to be civil when leaving me a message. If your comments are obviously meant to bait or anger me, they will be archived promptly and without warning (and an answer). Also, this is not the place for disputes with another editor; if they are raised, the argument will be archived and you will be directed to either the Mediation Committee, or, rarely, the Arbitration Committee.
Please do not vandalize this talk page. There is no need to so so; if you really want to vandalize something, do it in my sandbox. Also, please refrain from editing or removing the comments of another Wikipedian; there is simply no need to do so. Nonsense and vandalism will be removed by me. Don't change the formatting of my talk page either without notifying me beforehand.
Thank you for applying for VandalProof!(VP). As you may know, VP is a very powerful program, and in fact the just released 1.3 version has even more power. Because of this we must uphold strict protocols before approving a new applicant. Regretfully, I have chosen to decline your application at this time. The reason for this is that at this time you do not meet the minimum requirement of 250 edits to mainspace articles (see under mainhere). Please note it is nothing personal by any means, and we certainly welcome you to apply again soon. Thank you for your interest in VandalProof.Prodegotalk22:56, 15 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
My company is one of the most notable in the rock entertainment industry. Yet, omniscient Wikipedia admins are charged with having a comprehensive index of what entities are notable in every sector of the human experience. With all that knowledge, who needs Wikipedia! This self-righteous attitude is infuriating. That you assume to be aware of the situation and make a judgement with zero knowledge makes you a perfect fit for the Admin mold. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 69.142.140.177 (talk) 19:08, 16 December 2006 (UTC).[reply]
See WP:NOT. That probably explains why your article was deleted.
I assume your deletion of my question here means that your original comment posted on my talk page was a mistake, so I have likewise deleted it from my talk page, and you could go ahead and delete this current comment also, to keep your own talk page clear of clutter. If that is not the case, please answer the question as to why you posted that comment on my talk page. Wahkeenah02:23, 18 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
That's strange, I don't recall deleting it: and yet it's not here. I believe I spotted some vandalism coming from you; I might have been mistaken. It's standard procedure to put {{test1}} on a vandal's page: I believe I probably was mistaken. Thank you for bringing this to my concern. --Split Infinity(talk)02:50, 18 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
It definitely shows your user ID as having deleted it, but during the last hour or two, the history on lots of articles that I watch has been behaving strangely, and I suspect that has something to do with it: Maybe the database went wacko for a little while (to put it in technical terminology). Wahkeenah03:06, 18 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
I've had that happen from time to time, but it seemed like there was a flurry of it for a little while. I've seen that happen more often with photo postings. I have gotten used to the idea of updates being "immediate", but maybe the reality is that sometimes it can take awhile for the database to catch up to itself. Wahkeenah03:30, 18 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
That's probably it: my edits sometimes can take up to a minute to show up. I think it fixes itself by locking the database for one minute or so each day to synchronize things; I ran into this while editing just today. ŞρІϊţ ۞ ĨήƒϊήίтҰ(тąιк|соήтяївѕ)00:27, 19 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Hmmm... and 0 divided by 2 is 0. So infinity must be 0. Which means the universe collapses into a single point. Yet, here we are. So there must be a flaw in my reasoning. Wahkeenah04:09, 18 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
If you want to investigate vandalism, here's one. At least he's honest about it. But I think he is starting to go around to anything connected with Disney and posting this weird stuff about this obscure (to me, at least) video game. Dig his spelling, too: [1]Wahkeenah04:12, 18 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
I noticed you both voted in and closed the retrocausality AfD; this is considered inappropriate because of potential conflict-of-interest issues. It is also very unusual to close AfD's early without carefully considering the comments that have been made, and in this case there was one comment that substantially clarified the nomination and thus rendered all the keep votes above in need of reconsideration. There's no harm done, but may I politely suggest that you consider getting a little more experience with the *fD process before you start closing AfD's? Thanks, SCZenz08:07, 18 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Hello Split Infinity, I see that you have decided to join the AMA. I'll be the first to say welcome! We're always in need of more advocates, especially since were backlogged most of the time. Just a few pointers for what we do. We communicate by putting a template on our talk page. The template is {{AMA alerts}}. The AMA also has it's own IRC channel, which reports new cases and alerts to us. It can also be used as a place to ask for advice on an issue. If you'd like to jump right into a case, you are free to check out AMA Requests for Assistance, which is our new request for advocacy system. The instructions for how the technical part works is on it's talk page. You can also use the AMA userboxes that appear under here. If you have anymore questions about the organization, just ping any advocate's talk page, including our coordinator Steve Caruso or deputy coordinator Wikiwoohoo. Again, welcome to the AMA! . We're happy to have you on board! You can participate in our current meeting here, where we're discussing our internal policies. All of the members will be happy to help with any queries you have and for "real time" chat, you can go to our IRC channel - full details here. Martinp2320:24, 18 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Clerk duties pretty much work as outlined on Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee/Clerks/Procedures. There's really nothing more I can tell you apart from the fact you need to keep an eye on the time and don't close too early. There's a period of 24 hours after the deciding vote in which arbcom members can change their opinion. If you want to become a clerk, the best I can suggest is contacting Dmcdevit (talk·contribs). - Mgm|(talk)08:38, 19 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
His article is cited with a reference. There is discussion about it on his talk page and a second, albeit, shorter reference available New Zealand article. Ronbo76 01:59, 29 December 2006 (UTC)
My apologies. I was looking at the wrong side of the history column and had you confused with the unknown IP that changed the article. Ronbo7602:05, 29 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Hi! I'm Ral315, editor-in-chief of the Wikipedia Signpost. It appears that you have not edited in at least three weeks. To avoid spamming your talk page any further, should you be on leave, your name has been removed from the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to continue receiving the spamlist, please leave a note on my talk page to that effect, and I will restore your name, and keep you on the list indefinitely. Ralbot08:38, 31 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Why if an infinative is split does it mean loud and bold? Why not the opposite? This is one of those non factual /unresolved theorys of science? I'm confused on the actual meaning of ,To split an infinative means you do, -"What?" Sincerly Abbie
