User talk:Spinningspark/Archive 2

Archive 1

Archive 2

Archive 3

Archive 4

Archive 5

London 14

Following your participation the other Sunday, you may be interested to know that London 14 is scheduled for Sunday October 12 incase you weren't already aware. Best, WilliamH (talk) 11:28, 25 September 2008 (UTC)

DYK for George Ashley Campbell

On 28 September, 2008, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article George Ashley Campbell, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

Thank you for your contributions! - Cheers, Mailer Diablo 17:53, 28 September 2008 (UTC)

Re: Million monkeys

Beguiling, is it not? But, alas, I cannot claim anything about his remark other than my reaction (the smiley). The thought belongs to Jim. Take care. Gosgood (talk) 18:30, 28 September 2008 (UTC)

Avogadro constant

I've given what I hope is a full justification at Talk:Avogadro constant, as requested ;) I've also asked for comments on a related restructuring: as you seem to be the only other user actively watching this page, I hope you'll oblige! Best wishes. Physchim62 (talk) 11:18, 29 September 2008 (UTC)

Henri Pélissier

Hi, Many thanks for Henri Pélissier image. I assume that I was confounded by the PNG capitals. Next time I will be armed with the confidence of the copy cat. Autodidactyl (talk) 19:07, 1 October 2008 (UTC)

Pankhurst British spellings

Hey there, Spinning! Thanks for catching my spelling error on "labour" – I tried my best to use British English on the Emmeline Pankhurst article, but as a lifetime United Statesian, I'm nervous that I missed some spots. Do you have time to go through it (or maybe you already have) and check for other lapses I may have made? Thanks again! Scartol • Tok 00:47, 3 October 2008 (UTC)

Let's see if I can do this: You'll run it through spellcheck this weekend? Brilliant! Cheers, mate. Tally ho. (How was that? I've been listening to old episodes of The Ricky Gervais Show and taking on their linguistic patterns as best I can, since people in the UK sound so much cooler than folks in the US.) Scartol • Tok 11:44, 3 October 2008 (UTC)

Excellent. Thanks so much – apparently it not only fixed the improperly British spellings, but corrected errors under the heading of "Scartol is a moron" as well. "Pankurst"? Was I drunk when I wrote that?

As for the IE slicing of userboxes; I notice it at school, which is the only place I have access to IE these days. I can probably figure it out if I try, but right now I don't care enough to put in work on it. Thus the FireFox notice at the top of the page. Thanks for the reminder tho; one of these days I'll figure it out. Cheers. Scartol • Tok 12:24, 4 October 2008 (UTC)

Loading coil

See this. I would also commend the whole thing to your attention.

If someone else has referred to him as "brilliant", by all means quote them saying so and provide a footnote. Per WP:NPOV, Wikipedia cannot be taking a point of view here, no matter how widely accepted. Daniel Case (talk) 01:00, 3 October 2008 (UTC)

And if a source says it, it is insufficient simply to point me to the footnote. As it is there's no way to tell it's from a source. It needs some attribution. (also, rereading that section of text, I must ask: did you just copy it from the book? That's not an accusation of plagiarism, just a gentle request that you edit and/or rewrite it to be more in accord with encyclopedic style. Daniel Case (talk) 01:05, 3 October 2008 (UTC)

No, I did not copy it, I applied the epithet simply as something well known. It is actually quite by accident that the footnote happens to be pointing to a page which also uses it. The footnote was put in to support a rather more controversial claim regarding Pupin. Let's just agree to leave it out of the article. SpinningSpark 09:33, 3 October 2008 (UTC)

Not a problem. The prose just feels sort of like a book, that's all. Daniel Case (talk) 12:42, 3 October 2008 (UTC)

DYK for Loading coil

On 3 October, 2008, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Loading coil, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

BorgQueen (talk) 17:06, 3 October 2008 (UTC)

DYK for Carl Emil Krarup

On 9 October, 2008, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Carl Emil Krarup, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

Cirt (talk) 09:53, 9 October 2008 (UTC)

Reply

The page is fine now. I see that it has sources and that it is a good page. When I tagged it, It had no sources at all to back anything up. If I saw the page as it is now, It would not have gotten tagged. Thank you for the message. Beano (talk) 20:55, 12 October 2008 (UTC)

Claire odette fenby

Hi, after the sterling way you sorted Eddie Borysewicz, can you have look at/speedy delete Claire odette fenby. It appears to be pure spam, with no notability, but I have never been involved with speedy deletion. ( I thought about letting Beano lose on it but ...) Regards. Autodidactyl (talk) 16:49, 13 October 2008 (UTC)

Thanks. It wasn't me who placed the tag. Somebody did it while I was writing to you, then everything just happened so fast. But Thanks anyway. Autodidactyl (talk) 17:37, 13 October 2008 (UTC)

JSWP DYK

Hi. I noticed your comment on the article talk page. I can no longer access the page 1954 in Frankel. Could you just verify that the figure 400 relates to JSWP and not the Bundist self-defense units? --Soman (talk) 22:44, 14 October 2008 (UTC)

Thanks! I've changed the wording in the article and posted a comment at T:DYK. --Soman (talk) 06:28, 15 October 2008 (UTC)

DYK for Ripple (electrical)

On 17 October, 2008, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Ripple (electrical), which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

BorgQueen (talk) 03:06, 17 October 2008 (UTC)

Thanks for the tips

Thanks for the tips re: user names and articles. As I said on the help page, I will very likely write about another subject first (not actually in a mystery mood right now) but the Cara Black article is something to work on in the future. Thanks again! LovesMacs (talk) 15:36, 26 October 2008 (UTC)

Admin Coaching

Hi Spinningspark,

I just took a quick gander at your edits/history, and everything looks fine. I need to look at you a little closer, but if you want to go ahead and create a coaching page and answer the basic RfA questions that would be great. Also, what do you hope to obtain via coaching?---Balloonman ^PoppaBalloon 06:15, 27 October 2008 (UTC)

I will respond to the questions, but please note that most/many weeks I am not able to get on line from around now until about 19:00 UTC on Thursday, so I will not be doing that immediately - please bear with me. I was mostly provoked into making the request by my inability to carry out routine "housekeeping" tasks such as speedies and history merges. However, I have the temperament to systematically work through backlogs and I am sure there are many admin tasks I can provide enormous help with. SpinningSpark 07:25, 27 October 2008 (UTC)

No problem, I a take a long term approach to coaching... eg I don't rush it...---Balloonman ^PoppaBalloon 13:12, 27 October 2008 (UTC)

Just as an FYI, I haven't forgotten you, it's just that during the week I'm pretty busy, I do most of my coaching on the weekends... so bear with me. Do, however, try to answer the basic questions asked at RfA's... that way I know what you are interested in and it helps me identify areas for potential growth.---Balloonman ^PoppaBalloon 17:02, 30 October 2008 (UTC)

Dr Mabuse - Page title

Dr Mabuse (cycling) This excellent new page has been created by your old friend Les Woodland, but I suspect that it should be titled Bernard Sainz If this is true, what is the best way to rename/move/redirect/copy it, and preserve the history. Thanks. Regards. Autodidactyl (talk) 09:27, 28 October 2008 (UTC) ps (also copied to Victualler)

I've moved that for you. The best way to do these moves is with the "move" tab. That will move the history and the talk page along with the article. I have also speedied the old page name, not likely anyone is ever going to type that in the search box and Dr Mabuse has disambiguation for your article. SpinningSpark 21:13, 30 October 2008 (UTC)

Thanks. Tunnel vision or sheer incompetence, I have never noticed the Move tab nestling between history and watch.Autodidactyl (talk) 22:06, 30 October 2008 (UTC)

Main Page redesign

The Main Page Redesign proposal is currently conducting a straw poll to select five new designs, before an RFC in which one will be proposed to replace the Main Page. The poll closes on October 31st. Your input would be hugely appreciated! Many thanks, Pretzels^Talk! 09:28, 28 October 2008 (UTC)

Image:Rectifier with reservoir.svg

Is there a reason behind this? Unless you have a valid reason I'm going to move it. CWii_(BOO!|Eeek!) 22:31, 2 November 2008 (UTC)

The reason is that I have had endless problems with images that have been moved to Commons. Images get moved to Commons with incomplete information, then Commons deletes them because the info is incomplete. Meanwhile the image is gone from Wikipedia and the history cannot be recovered. The Lecher line article had a circuit diagram in it that had been there for years. That got moved to Commons and exactly that happpened to it. I caught it before it actually got deleted but could not stop it happening. Because the history was gone from Wikipedia, the original uploader could not be found to verify the status and tag it. Anyone with an ounce of common sense could see that a simple circuit diagram was never going to be the subject of copyright suit but it got deleted anyway. I took the trouble to reproduce the diagram before it went, no-one in the trigger happy deletion brigade would ever consider doing that but it is ok to create work for me.

I see a lot of images on commons with something like source "said to be by xxxx". I have not really looked into this but it does not seem to be properly crediting the author in these cases. Can you assure me that the info template will appear on commons exactly as I originally completed it? - that is complete with Description, Source and Author field. Looking at a few random images on commons, these fields are NOT as originally completed. I know it's not the case here, but it does happen that images are modified after first creation. Does the history of the original version go to commons as well? If you are answering no to anything here then you know why I am objecting. SpinningSpark 22:58, 2 November 2008 (UTC)

Everything should stay intact during transit. The history doesn't get moved as it's technical impossible. Here's an example of what the images will look like after being moved by my bot. I'm going to retag the images. CWii_(BOO!|Eeek!) 23:46, 2 November 2008 (UTC)

Well that is anything but intact. The fields are not the same as the original. Please do not retag them, I contributed the work to Wikipedia, if I had wanted the images on Commons, I would have uploaded them there myself. SpinningSpark 23:51, 2 November 2008 (UTC)

Then this is what is going to happen, I'm going to tag the images to be moved to the commons, but not to mark the local ones for deletion. CWii_(BOO!|Eeek!) 00:00, 3 November 2008 (UTC)

I don't think that will work, images are tagged for deletion when an identical one is found on Commons. SpinningSpark 00:04, 3 November 2008 (UTC)

The robot will slap on a {{NoCommons}}. CWii_(BOO!|Eeek!) 00:07, 3 November 2008 (UTC)

That's good, thanks for bearing with me. Can I pre-emptively use that template on new diagrams? SpinningSpark 00:09, 3 November 2008 (UTC)

Sure. CWii_(BOO!|Eeek!) 00:18, 3 November 2008 (UTC)

Military Capabilities

Hi Trick or Treat. Do you agree that UK's military capability is below Iran's Military Capability? How's your opinion? <G --Jack332 (talk) 13:56, 3 November 2008 (UTC)

I have no idea. Nor do I care much. If you are thinking of adding UK to that table, it really does not matter what order you put them in, the table is sortable by any of the columns. SpinningSpark 14:02, 3 November 2008 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Editor assistance/Requests

		The Help Desk Barnstar
		A recognition for your tireless contributions in the Wikipedia:Editor assistance/Requests MaNiAδIs-τάλκ-GuεστBooκ 10:34, 4 November 2008 (UTC)

Re O. Brune

I based by stub sorting on existing categorisation. If he was not American then the category is wrong as well. looking again you were the one who added that category. Waacstats (talk) 18:07, 8 November 2008 (UTC)

Your help with Baythorne End

Hi - thanks for your help in the above dispute. I'm most grateful for you pointing out what I'd done wrong, as it was easy for me to see what was wrong with the other editors' contributions - without stopping and looking at myself. I guess the premise of the three revert rule is to stop edit warring, which (in this case) technically didn't happen with three reverts in 24 hours. I'm going to cool off on this article now, it's still in my watchlist but I'm hoping that now another editor has stepped in, they'll realise that there are reasons for our policies. Booglamay (talk) - 14:16, 9 November 2008 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Cauer.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:Cauer.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 05:12, 10 November 2008 (UTC)

Klotski

Hi, I saw that you recently added Klotski to Combination puzzles. Just thought I should point out that sliding block puzzles is possibly a more relevant link, since this is a general family of games that includes such things as Rush Hour, or Minoru Abe's pathologically difficult "Climb" puzzles (e.g. Climb Pro 24, for which no minimal solution is known due to the absolutely massive number of possible combinations and the nature of the puzzle, which seems to require brute-force search). Having said that, though, sliding block puzzle seems to need some attention and some fleshing out, and I'm wondering if you may have some knowledge about it that you could contribute.—Tetracube (talk) 20:20, 10 November 2008 (UTC)

Don't really have any special knowledge. I added Klotski because it is a) well known, b) I liked the wooden block picture (much nicer than all those on-line versions) and c) the sliding block puzzle article is only about uniform square block puzzles (does this type have a generic name? should that be the name of the article?). Sliding block puzzle already has a link in combination puzzles - in fact it has two. Klotski seems to be distinctly different from those, but feel free to make it more logical if you want. The only thing I could really add is that I have a 3-D version of Klotski which continually drops random shaped blocks into the puzzle. That certainly makes you think fast but I don't think the puzzle is notable in the Wikipedia sense as far as I know. SpinningSpark 19:48, 13 November 2008 (UTC)

Qualifying the descriptive term "pro-family" as "self-described"

Hi, you're the most recent editor volunteering assistance, so I'd appreciate your comment on this issue: Qualifying the descriptive term "pro-family" as "self-described"

Thanks. —EqualRights (talk) 14:42, 16 November 2008 (UTC)

Sorry

I'm sorry if it seemed like I was harassing everyone, I wasn't aware that replying to the occasional keep argument was a problem. If you think it is, then that's your opinion, but I'm not going to stop replying to comments just because you throw abuse at me. I might stop replying to them if someone asked me to, or pointed out what I was doing wrong, as someone already has, after your comment. Sorry to bite, but your comment shook me somewhat: this AfD has frankly blown up out of all proportion, I've had three abusive emails since it started, not counting the one threatening to report me to my employer. I know what you were trying to say, but maybe in future you could say it a bit nicer? Sorry if this sounds rude. Chase me ladies, I'm the Cavalry (talk) 22:30, 16 November 2008 (UTC)

No, you are not being rude, I was the one who used an uncivil tone. To make it clear, my point was that it is not necessary to reply to every single poster. I think the best way to proceed is to make your argument and invoke the relevant policies then let everyone else make there comment in turn. The way it looks to someone new to the discussion is that if they !vote keep they will get flamed by the proposer. That can be intimidating to some people, especially the wiki inexperienced. Personally, when I make an AfD nomination, I only respond if there is new information to add, there is a misunderstanding that must be clarified or I am directly asked a question. If people are making a bad argument I do not feel it is necessary to challenge them, if I can see that it is wrong, others will as well and a faulty argument on the other side works in your favour. I might in rare cases respond in a single post if I felt several people were missing a point, but otherwise leave them to make up there own mind. Sorry for the blunt comment but I figured as a Navy man you would have heard a lot worse and would not take it to heart. SpinningSpark 22:47, 16 November 2008 (UTC)

geordie dialect

tks for your comment. geordie is one of the easier ones, i knew several geordies in the army. the quite difficult ones were glasgow and aberdeen. here is a quote for you:

behind every successful man, there stands (pause) an astonished mother-in-law!

best regardsMiletus (talk) 14:45, 18 November 2008 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Roundview College

You said the info on this page can easily be absorped in the article on the show. Can you explain why you then !voted delete instead of a merge or a redirect in this discussion. Those are more common options for people who support information to be moved elsewhere. - Mgm|^(talk) 09:51, 19 November 2008 (UTC)

Answered on the AfD page. SpinningSpark 13:24, 20 November 2008 (UTC)

Kids to bed, then reviewing your edits.

be back soon.---Balloonman ^PoppaBalloon 02:35, 22 November 2008 (UTC)

Look forward to it - in the morning - I'm up way too late already, goodnight. SpinningSpark 02:45, 22 November 2008 (UTC)

Could use your help and advice

Greetings!

I'd be grateful if you could take a look at the recent history of the Christian Coalition of America article. An anonymous user with the IP 74.230.238.189 has been persistently deleting large portions of the article, and replacing other sections. I have repeatedly asked this user to discuss reasons for the deletions on the talkpage; there has been no response other than to re-insert the changes every time they're deleted. At this point, I feel that it's appropriate to request some form of arbitration, but I'm not sure which level of arbitration to seek. I noticed that you were willing to help out in matters of dispute resolution, and as a relatively new editor, I wanted to seek the guidance of someone more experienced before I take any further steps. Thanks in advance for any help you can provide. --BRPierce (talk) 13:11, 26 November 2008 (UTC)

In response to your accusations

Did you even bother to check the picture like I said? By putting the pic back you are the one Putting the vandalism there. Not me

I repeat. Turn the contrast on your screen down, and look at the picture on the page. Check it this time Repner1 (talk) 21:24, 30 November 2008 (UTC)

Replied on your talk page. SpinningSpark 21:57, 30 November 2008 (UTC)

Blank.jpg

Regarding Wikipedia:Suspected sock puppets/BreakEvenMatt: I can confirm that Repner1 (talk · contribs) was right--there was a the word "bitch" in that picture and Windymager (talk · contribs) put it there. You probably owe Repner1 and BreakEvenMatt (talk · contribs) an apology, as I think your response was out of line. Anyways, I have fixed the problem (see the SSP entry). --HoboJones (talk) 02:57, 1 December 2008 (UTC)

• You accuse me of socking and trolling? You are way off on this. Here is the vandalism in question: [1], just look at it! If you can't see it, open it in MS Paint and use the fill tool. --HoboJones (talk) 11:58, 1 December 2008 (UTC)
  • OK, so let me get this straight: You SSP'd two users who reverted vandalism. Then when I confirmed their account, you SSP'd me too. Now that you realize that we were all right, you're checkuser'd everyone? Seriously, leave me out of this. Windymager (talk · contribs) is the vandal, and I already warned him. Checkuser is not a fishing expedition.--HoboJones (talk) 15:37, 1 December 2008 (UTC)
  • By the way, you should, out of courtesy, notify people who are nominated for checkuser, which you failed to do.--HoboJones (talk) 15:43, 1 December 2008 (UTC)

Your RFCU

I am writing to request that you rescind Wikipedia:Requests for checkuser/Case/BreakEvenMatt & Wikipedia:Suspected sock puppets/BreakEvenMatt. Two administrators, one an uninvolved party (User:Xymmax) and your admin coach User:Balloonman, agree that there is not enough evidence to warrant a RFCU. As User:Balloonman said "do the right thing" and rescind these allegations.--HoboJones (talk) 18:50, 4 December 2008 (UTC)

Note: I have emailed this message to the user, since he has not edited in 3+ days.--HoboJones (talk) 18:52, 4 December 2008 (UTC)

FYI, he has told me elsewhere that he usually doesn't have ready access to the internet from Monday-Thursday, so it doesn't surprise me that he hasn't responded.---Balloonman ^PoppaBalloon 18:58, 4 December 2008 (UTC)

I see, well that is certainly understandable. Regards, --HoboJones (talk) 19:06, 4 December 2008 (UTC)

I have apologised to all involved on their talk pages. SpinningSpark 22:10, 5 December 2008 (UTC)

No worries mate. I can see the reasons why you did it. I think it's best that we put this behind us :) Repner1 (talk) 23:03, 5 December 2008 (UTC)

Note: The SSP case has not been closed yet, the RFCU was and the guy who closed it indicated on the SSP case that he denied the RFCU.---Balloonman ^PoppaBalloon 09:50, 6 December 2008 (UTC)

Oh thanks, I had missed that. I have now belatedly requested the case to be closed. SpinningSpark 10:08, 6 December 2008 (UTC)

About page: Karakaj

Which of my edits have you thought about exactly? I'm asking because, to be honest, I think I haven't done anything inappropriate. Of course, I may be wrong, so would you tell me where I've made a mistake? Thanks a lot. Xochitlan 17:24, 6 December 2008 (UTC)

Responded on your talk page. SpinningSpark 18:26, 6 December 2008 (UTC)

Everything's clear to me now. My fault, I agree. Thank you for the explanation! Xochitlan 08:40, 10 December 2008 (UTC)

Re:Antimatter, Re.:In fiction - Star Trek

The ships are not powered by dilithium crystals. The crystals are a regulator, not a power source. See http://www.startrek.com. Powerzilla (talk) 01:42, 16 December 2008 (UTC)

Dropkick Murphy

Spinningspark....you commented on my contribution to the Dropkick Murphys Wiki entry. You cited my use of the first person and lack of reliable source. Unfortunately, I am the reliable source and the citations anfd info in the entries from the band Dropkick Murphys is inaccurate and just plain wrong. I am trying to let the public know the real origin of the band's name, which they apparently are clueless about. I cannot come up with any more reliable resource than having known the real "Dropkick" Murphy. --Matthewsei (talk) 22:39, 23 December 2008 (UTC)

Thank you

Thank you for your help with the mixed-signal integrated circuit article. --68.0.124.33 (talk) 04:07, 29 December 2008 (UTC)

DYK for Bartlett's bisection theorem

On 30 December, 2008, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Bartlett's bisection theorem, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

Dravecky 09:25, 30 December 2008 (UTC)

Help required

Hi. Please excuse the post but I was after some advice. I am having difficulty with an anonymous contributor who is posting and re-posting a speculative paragraph about computer crime on Gravesend Grammar School. As you will see from my user profile I have contributed a lot to the site as well as being the Chairman of the Governing Body. The contributor continues to post information which concerns a former member of staff, an internal and confidential staffing issue and draws a sepculative conclusion, which if I was the person named, I would consider to be libellous. Naturally I want to preserve the integrity of the article and avoid Wiki being used for speculation. The comments add nothing to the article about the history and nature of the school. I have reverted this three times but do not want to do more because of the three reverts rule, I have tried to keep my comments with the contributor objective, but I fear this will descend into an edit war. What do you suggest I do? Mithrandir1967 (talk) 21:20, 3 January 2009 (UTC)

Replied on your talk page. SpinningSpark 22:05, 3 January 2009 (UTC)

Many thanks. It seems someone else has picked up on this as well. Mithrandir1967 (talk) 23:42, 3 January 2009 (UTC)

DYK for Paul Boucherot

On 4 January, 2009, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Paul Boucherot, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

--Dravecky (talk) 21:32, 4 January 2009 (UTC)

Holiday mayhem

Now that the holidays are over, let's get back to what we were doing... I'll try to do a detailed review over the weekend.---Balloonman ^PoppaBalloonCSD Survey Results 19:17, 8 January 2009 (UTC)

History of electrical resonance

It's been filled.--droptone (talk) 16:14, 9 January 2009 (UTC)

Archive 1

Archive 2

Archive 3

Archive 4

Archive 5